<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sitting down with DualCor Technologies at the CES</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jkontherun.com/2006/01/07/sitting_down_wi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jkontherun.com/2006/01/07/sitting_down_wi/</link>
	<description>Using mobile devices since they weighed 30 lbs.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:32:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mobilizer</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2006/01/07/sitting_down_wi/#comment-35027</link>
		<dc:creator>mobilizer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 17:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/01/07/sitting_down_wi#comment-35027</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;What is the story with this device? Looks like amazing specs even over a year later when compared with the HTC Shift. Is it vapourware? What is the story?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Any news appreciated...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>What is the story with this device? Looks like amazing specs even over a year later when compared with the HTC Shift. Is it vapourware? What is the story?</p>
<p>Any news appreciated&#8230;</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim H</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2006/01/07/sitting_down_wi/#comment-35030</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 18:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/01/07/sitting_down_wi#comment-35030</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Anything new on the CPC? I would like to buy one, but I heard they bombed.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Anything new on the CPC? I would like to buy one, but I heard they bombed.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tracy Hooten</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2006/01/07/sitting_down_wi/#comment-35035</link>
		<dc:creator>Tracy Hooten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2006 04:24:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/01/07/sitting_down_wi#comment-35035</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;I simulated the size by enlarging a picture of it to the reported specs. It seemed a little big. I then pulled out my current cell phone I consider small. When the cell phone&#039;s in talking mode, it&#039;s the exact length of the mock-up cPC and only an inch or so wider. I don&#039;t think I&#039;ll have any problem using this as a regular phone, although it&#039;d be nice using a headset (not much luck in the past with those, however).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Considering I eventually want all of the following: slate tablet pc, GPS for my car, an upgraded phone, and a handheld...well I&#039;ll be jumping on the DualCor as soon as my checkbook signals green. Can you imagine the possibilities for integrating this baby with a car? Wow...beautiful. I can&#039;t wait!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I could live without Bluetooth, but WiFi...wow, that&#039;d be tough. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Now if only I can use Sprint with it!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>I simulated the size by enlarging a picture of it to the reported specs. It seemed a little big. I then pulled out my current cell phone I consider small. When the cell phone&#8217;s in talking mode, it&#8217;s the exact length of the mock-up cPC and only an inch or so wider. I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ll have any problem using this as a regular phone, although it&#8217;d be nice using a headset (not much luck in the past with those, however).</p>
<p>Considering I eventually want all of the following: slate tablet pc, GPS for my car, an upgraded phone, and a handheld&#8230;well I&#8217;ll be jumping on the DualCor as soon as my checkbook signals green. Can you imagine the possibilities for integrating this baby with a car? Wow&#8230;beautiful. I can&#8217;t wait!</p>
<p>I could live without Bluetooth, but WiFi&#8230;wow, that&#8217;d be tough. </p>
<p>Now if only I can use Sprint with it!</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Cane</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2006/01/07/sitting_down_wi/#comment-35038</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Cane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2006 12:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/01/07/sitting_down_wi#comment-35038</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;I think some confusion was caused by the phrase &quot;WiFi, Bluetooth, 3G enabled&quot; -- it can be parsed more than one way.  I parse it as &quot;3G enabled&quot; -- which means, possibility of 3G later on, but WiFi and BT *built-in now*.  Only makes sense that way.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>I think some confusion was caused by the phrase &#8220;WiFi, Bluetooth, 3G enabled&#8221; &#8212; it can be parsed more than one way.  I parse it as &#8220;3G enabled&#8221; &#8212; which means, possibility of 3G later on, but WiFi and BT *built-in now*.  Only makes sense that way.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2006/01/07/sitting_down_wi/#comment-35042</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2006 21:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/01/07/sitting_down_wi#comment-35042</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s quite possible they could launch a quad band/EDGE GSM version in March. Carrier support not needed, just a SIM card slot.&lt;br /&gt;
WiFi &amp; BT have to be built in, it would be a deal killer otherwise.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s quite possible they could launch a quad band/EDGE GSM version in March. Carrier support not needed, just a SIM card slot.<br />
WiFi &#038; BT have to be built in, it would be a deal killer otherwise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Cane</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2006/01/07/sitting_down_wi/#comment-35044</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Cane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 19:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/01/07/sitting_down_wi#comment-35044</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Wouldn&#039;t owners most likely use a headset with it?&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Wouldn&#8217;t owners most likely use a headset with it?</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Cane</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2006/01/07/sitting_down_wi/#comment-35046</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Cane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 19:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/01/07/sitting_down_wi#comment-35046</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Wouldn&#039;t owners most likely use a headset with it?&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Wouldn&#8217;t owners most likely use a headset with it?</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MiniMage</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2006/01/07/sitting_down_wi/#comment-35048</link>
		<dc:creator>MiniMage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 17:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/01/07/sitting_down_wi#comment-35048</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;That predicted price is very depressing. I understand why it is that high, but it puts this beauty out of my reach.  When I spend that much again, it will be for a Tablet PC that can play Age of Empires III.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Still, I do love the concept. As someone who has been dreaming of owning a PPC phone for some time, this is even more exciting.  They broke out of the industry mold and gave the thing decent resolution, too, bravo!  Only one thing (other than battery life): I&#039;ve yet to see a photo of it next to someone&#039;s head.  Perhaps I haven&#039;t looked hard enough, but I did go to their site.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>That predicted price is very depressing. I understand why it is that high, but it puts this beauty out of my reach.  When I spend that much again, it will be for a Tablet PC that can play Age of Empires III.</p>
<p>Still, I do love the concept. As someone who has been dreaming of owning a PPC phone for some time, this is even more exciting.  They broke out of the industry mold and gave the thing decent resolution, too, bravo!  Only one thing (other than battery life): I&#8217;ve yet to see a photo of it next to someone&#8217;s head.  Perhaps I haven&#8217;t looked hard enough, but I did go to their site.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Cane</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2006/01/07/sitting_down_wi/#comment-35050</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Cane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 13:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/01/07/sitting_down_wi#comment-35050</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;Do some Bs have 4 pins vs 5?  I was looking at convertable USB cables recently and it seems the variety is just frightening.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Not only would no wireless built-in change the weight, it&#039;d change the portability factor too.  &quot;Did I pack that WiFi CF/SD?&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And for the troll:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://techdirt.com/articles/20060109/1012239_F.shtml&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://techdirt.com/articles/20060109/1012239_F.shtml&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Do some Bs have 4 pins vs 5?  I was looking at convertable USB cables recently and it seems the variety is just frightening.</p>
<p>Not only would no wireless built-in change the weight, it&#8217;d change the portability factor too.  &#8220;Did I pack that WiFi CF/SD?&#8221;</p>
<p>And for the troll:</p>
<p><a href="http://techdirt.com/articles/20060109/1012239_F.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://techdirt.com/articles/20060109/1012239_F.shtml</a></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: weatheryoko</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2006/01/07/sitting_down_wi/#comment-35052</link>
		<dc:creator>weatheryoko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 10:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/01/07/sitting_down_wi#comment-35052</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;JK,&lt;br /&gt;
Based on your response above, it sounds like you do not have a pre-production unit to test and evaluate. Is that correct? &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m seriously concerned about the integrated vs. not-integrated Wifi and BT. If its not integrated, I&#039;m not interested. Based on Chris&#039; remarks, your post [qoute] Weight approximately 1 pound (depending on wireless options) [\quote] makes sense. If you need to add a BT or WiFi Dongle, it would change the weight.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Please let us know (as I&#039;m sure you will) what you&#039;re able to find out. Thanks again.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Also, when do you foresee a full review of this device?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Why the Type B USB connector? Can this be used as an &quot;external storage unit&quot; by another PC? &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;(This may be classifed as a stupid question): Can Type A devices (i.e. a USB keyboard) be connected to a Type B Connector (assuming you buy a Type A to Type B adapter)? &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thank you.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>JK,<br />
Based on your response above, it sounds like you do not have a pre-production unit to test and evaluate. Is that correct? </p>
<p>I&#8217;m seriously concerned about the integrated vs. not-integrated Wifi and BT. If its not integrated, I&#8217;m not interested. Based on Chris&#8217; remarks, your post [qoute] Weight approximately 1 pound (depending on wireless options) [\quote] makes sense. If you need to add a BT or WiFi Dongle, it would change the weight.</p>
<p>Please let us know (as I&#8217;m sure you will) what you&#8217;re able to find out. Thanks again.</p>
<p>Also, when do you foresee a full review of this device?</p>
<p>Why the Type B USB connector? Can this be used as an &#8220;external storage unit&#8221; by another PC? </p>
<p>(This may be classifed as a stupid question): Can Type A devices (i.e. a USB keyboard) be connected to a Type B Connector (assuming you buy a Type A to Type B adapter)? </p>
<p>Thank you.
</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Cane</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2006/01/07/sitting_down_wi/#comment-35054</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Cane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 09:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/01/07/sitting_down_wi#comment-35054</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Give me a break.  This prattle sounds like the same nitwit who is trolling the handtops.com forum.  Sorry to see his infection has now spread to this site.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Give me a break.  This prattle sounds like the same nitwit who is trolling the handtops.com forum.  Sorry to see his infection has now spread to this site.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gemsmaker</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2006/01/07/sitting_down_wi/#comment-35056</link>
		<dc:creator>Gemsmaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2006 20:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/01/07/sitting_down_wi#comment-35056</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;JK, here&#039;s *proof* of what I&#039;m talking about here with these desperate oQoers. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The following is a link to the CNET review that states that DualCor cPC will have, as it goes to market in March 2006, wifi &quot;g&quot; built into it: &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnet.com/4831-11405_1-6412631-1.html?tag=cnetfd.sd&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.cnet.com/4831-11405_1-6412631-1.html?tag=cnetfd.sd&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Not, CNET&#039;s one of the best and most recognized reviewers of technology out there. To say that they don&#039;t know what they&#039;re talking about is like saying that you don&#039;t know what you&#039;re talking about with regards to technology. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Agenda&#039;s fully exposed. The oQo-ers *are* going to *deliberately* do this. They&#039;re shaking in their boots...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>JK, here&#8217;s *proof* of what I&#8217;m talking about here with these desperate oQoers. </p>
<p>The following is a link to the CNET review that states that DualCor cPC will have, as it goes to market in March 2006, wifi &#8220;g&#8221; built into it: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.cnet.com/4831-11405_1-6412631-1.html?tag=cnetfd.sd" rel="nofollow">http://www.cnet.com/4831-11405_1-6412631-1.html?tag=cnetfd.sd</a></p>
<p>Not, CNET&#8217;s one of the best and most recognized reviewers of technology out there. To say that they don&#8217;t know what they&#8217;re talking about is like saying that you don&#8217;t know what you&#8217;re talking about with regards to technology. </p>
<p>Agenda&#8217;s fully exposed. The oQo-ers *are* going to *deliberately* do this. They&#8217;re shaking in their boots&#8230;</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gemsmaker</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2006/01/07/sitting_down_wi/#comment-35059</link>
		<dc:creator>Gemsmaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2006 20:05:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/01/07/sitting_down_wi#comment-35059</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;JK, beware, these false rumors are being spread by frightened and desperate oQo-ers (and perhaps by oQoers, at least employees themselves). There are plenty of public reviews out that that indicate to the contrary. For example, I just read one a day or so ago that is linked at handtops.com under the cPC DualCor forum over there that indicates that the &quot;g&quot; wifi standard is going to be in the March 2006 cPC production run. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The evident glee in these posts are all the intelligent reader needs to know about the oQo-ers fear driven &quot;please don&#039;t drive oQo out of business&quot; agenda. :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>JK, beware, these false rumors are being spread by frightened and desperate oQo-ers (and perhaps by oQoers, at least employees themselves). There are plenty of public reviews out that that indicate to the contrary. For example, I just read one a day or so ago that is linked at handtops.com under the cPC DualCor forum over there that indicates that the &#8220;g&#8221; wifi standard is going to be in the March 2006 cPC production run. </p>
<p>The evident glee in these posts are all the intelligent reader needs to know about the oQo-ers fear driven &#8220;please don&#8217;t drive oQo out of business&#8221; agenda. <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Cane</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2006/01/07/sitting_down_wi/#comment-35062</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Cane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2006 19:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/01/07/sitting_down_wi#comment-35062</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;NO NO NO BT or WiFi?!!?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s now the DUDcor!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>NO NO NO BT or WiFi?!!?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s now the DUDcor!</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jk</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2006/01/07/sitting_down_wi/#comment-35063</link>
		<dc:creator>jk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2006 17:20:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/01/07/sitting_down_wi#comment-35063</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Wow, Chris. I understood that WiFi and BT were integrated into the unit. With no integrated networking the cPC will be DOA at launch.  Now that I think about it DualCor didn&#039;t say the WiFi and BT were integrated but it never occurred to me that any PC today would be released without at least WiFi.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Wow, Chris. I understood that WiFi and BT were integrated into the unit. With no integrated networking the cPC will be DOA at launch.  Now that I think about it DualCor didn&#8217;t say the WiFi and BT were integrated but it never occurred to me that any PC today would be released without at least WiFi.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris De Herrera</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2006/01/07/sitting_down_wi/#comment-35064</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris De Herrera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2006 15:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/01/07/sitting_down_wi#comment-35064</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the update on the Dualcor cPC.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;However just to be perfectly clear, there is no built in networking (wi-fi, bluetooth, ethernet or cellular (GSM or CDMA).  These functions can be added using the CompactFlash slot or USB ports.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Thanks for the update on the Dualcor cPC.</p>
<p>However just to be perfectly clear, there is no built in networking (wi-fi, bluetooth, ethernet or cellular (GSM or CDMA).  These functions can be added using the CompactFlash slot or USB ports.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
