<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New UMPC appears to be same ol&#8217; thing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jkontherun.com/2006/04/28/new_umpc_appear/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jkontherun.com/2006/04/28/new_umpc_appear/</link>
	<description>Using mobile devices since they weighed 30 lbs.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 11:47:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave Jansen</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2006/04/28/new_umpc_appear/#comment-33654</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Jansen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2006 16:42:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/04/28/new_umpc_appear#comment-33654</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Sorry for saying this, but the whole UMPC concept is far from new... Just wait a bit for Apple to release their tablet, I&#039;m sure that&#039;ll boost the creativity for the rest of the guys.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Sorry for saying this, but the whole UMPC concept is far from new&#8230; Just wait a bit for Apple to release their tablet, I&#8217;m sure that&#8217;ll boost the creativity for the rest of the guys.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mickey Segal</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2006/04/28/new_umpc_appear/#comment-33656</link>
		<dc:creator>Mickey Segal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2006 16:14:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/04/28/new_umpc_appear#comment-33656</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;One form of diversity that would be welcome is a screen that is 800 x 600 instead of 800 x 480.   &lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>One form of diversity that would be welcome is a screen that is 800 x 600 instead of 800 x 480.   </p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evan</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2006/04/28/new_umpc_appear/#comment-33658</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2006 16:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/04/28/new_umpc_appear#comment-33658</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;The main thing to remember here is that the VIA based design that Amtek built is the only &quot;alternative&quot; design that is &quot;currently available&quot; in the ODM community.  ASUStek, Samsung and Founder all have their own designs, but since no &quot;major&quot; OEM picked up the Amtek design all the little guys get a chance to resell it.  The difficulty here is that not too many ODMs are going to create a new design for an UMPC without having an OEM already lined up given the costs; however the design that Amtek is selling was funded elsewhere so the costs were already taken care of.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>The main thing to remember here is that the VIA based design that Amtek built is the only &#8220;alternative&#8221; design that is &#8220;currently available&#8221; in the ODM community.  ASUStek, Samsung and Founder all have their own designs, but since no &#8220;major&#8221; OEM picked up the Amtek design all the little guys get a chance to resell it.  The difficulty here is that not too many ODMs are going to create a new design for an UMPC without having an OEM already lined up given the costs; however the design that Amtek is selling was funded elsewhere so the costs were already taken care of.
</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin C. Tofel</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2006/04/28/new_umpc_appear/#comment-33660</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin C. Tofel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2006 14:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/04/28/new_umpc_appear#comment-33660</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Thanks guys. I know that all of these models are from AMTek; I didn&#039;t make my point very well as I re-read the post. As the buzz from the initial UMPC noise is dying down a little, it appears that some companies are trying to keep the noise level up with &quot;new&quot; UMPC announcements until we get some devices in our hot little hands. I should say your hands Frank, since you ordered the eo and I didn&#039;t! ;) I guess my overall point is: I&#039;d like to see some truly different offerings but I completely realize that the UMPC-market is brand-spankin&#039; new and my expectations are too high at this point.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Thanks guys. I know that all of these models are from AMTek; I didn&#8217;t make my point very well as I re-read the post. As the buzz from the initial UMPC noise is dying down a little, it appears that some companies are trying to keep the noise level up with &#8220;new&#8221; UMPC announcements until we get some devices in our hot little hands. I should say your hands Frank, since you ordered the eo and I didn&#8217;t! <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  I guess my overall point is: I&#8217;d like to see some truly different offerings but I completely realize that the UMPC-market is brand-spankin&#8217; new and my expectations are too high at this point.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2006/04/28/new_umpc_appear/#comment-33662</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2006 14:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/04/28/new_umpc_appear#comment-33662</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Thanks Steve, you read it my mind!&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Thanks Steve, you read it my mind!</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anton P. Nym</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2006/04/28/new_umpc_appear/#comment-33663</link>
		<dc:creator>Anton P. Nym</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2006 13:16:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/04/28/new_umpc_appear#comment-33663</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;The eo, Easybook, SmartCaddie, and It&#039;s Label all look the same because they ARE all the same; they&#039;re all from AMTek, though I don&#039;t know the specific arrangement with the OEMs.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;ASUS, Founder, and Samsung do have different designs to them.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt; -- Steve&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>The eo, Easybook, SmartCaddie, and It&#8217;s Label all look the same because they ARE all the same; they&#8217;re all from AMTek, though I don&#8217;t know the specific arrangement with the OEMs.</p>
<p>ASUS, Founder, and Samsung do have different designs to them.</p>
<p> &#8212; Steve</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fernando</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2006/04/28/new_umpc_appear/#comment-33664</link>
		<dc:creator>Fernando</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2006 12:56:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/04/28/new_umpc_appear#comment-33664</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Well, to be quite honest, I don&#039;t really see the hype behind the UMPC now, when actually the Sony U (which still has better specs than all the prospective UMPCs now showing up) has been around for over 2 years. True, these UMPCs are cheaper, but the U is still far a better concept. Too bad it was not continued by Sony. &lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Well, to be quite honest, I don&#8217;t really see the hype behind the UMPC now, when actually the Sony U (which still has better specs than all the prospective UMPCs now showing up) has been around for over 2 years. True, these UMPCs are cheaper, but the U is still far a better concept. Too bad it was not continued by Sony. </p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
