<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows Live OneCare- buyer beware</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jkontherun.com/2006/04/29/windows_live_on_1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jkontherun.com/2006/04/29/windows_live_on_1/</link>
	<description>Using mobile devices since they weighed 30 lbs.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:10:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Scotty</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2006/04/29/windows_live_on_1/#comment-33633</link>
		<dc:creator>Scotty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 11:33:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/04/29/windows_live_on_1#comment-33633</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;It could be worst, they could do it up Oracle style.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You forget to renew your Oracle support contract and they say no problem, we&#039;ll sell you a new copy of the product which comes with a new support contract.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That gets a bit spendy for their database product where you are paying by the CPU. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>It could be worst, they could do it up Oracle style.</p>
<p>You forget to renew your Oracle support contract and they say no problem, we&#8217;ll sell you a new copy of the product which comes with a new support contract.</p>
<p>That gets a bit spendy for their database product where you are paying by the CPU. </p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mickey Segal</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2006/04/29/windows_live_on_1/#comment-33635</link>
		<dc:creator>Mickey Segal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Apr 2006 17:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/04/29/windows_live_on_1#comment-33635</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;PC Magazine started billing my credit card automatically without my having given consent to do so.  I took that opportunity to cancel my subscription, which I might otherwise have renewed (though reading jkOnTheRun and GottaBeMobile provides better content at a much better price).&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>PC Magazine started billing my credit card automatically without my having given consent to do so.  I took that opportunity to cancel my subscription, which I might otherwise have renewed (though reading jkOnTheRun and GottaBeMobile provides better content at a much better price).</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Einstein</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2006/04/29/windows_live_on_1/#comment-33637</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Einstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Apr 2006 12:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/04/29/windows_live_on_1#comment-33637</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;Oh and to Michael in the comments:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Unfortunately, this is the case for EVERY virus/spyware scanner. I just had an infestation and I ran like 5 different scanners and they all gave me 5 different sets of results. A majority of the results overlaped, but each one found some that the others didn&#039;t. So you&#039;re not completely safe with any of them. It just is another layer of protection.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Oh and to Michael in the comments:</p>
<p>Unfortunately, this is the case for EVERY virus/spyware scanner. I just had an infestation and I ran like 5 different scanners and they all gave me 5 different sets of results. A majority of the results overlaped, but each one found some that the others didn&#8217;t. So you&#8217;re not completely safe with any of them. It just is another layer of protection.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Einstein</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2006/04/29/windows_live_on_1/#comment-33642</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Einstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Apr 2006 12:47:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/04/29/windows_live_on_1#comment-33642</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;James, this is standard practice with recurring billing. Everybody does it, Match.com, Xbox Live, internet service providers, etc. But they&#039;ll almost always refund you if you call and cancel even after you&#039;ve been charged.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You&#039;ll also most likely get notified a few weeks before they do it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Anyway, after what I just went through, I&#039;d much rather get charged $49.99 a year on an automatic schedule than forget to renew and wind up going the torture of an infestation again.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Besides, I use Microsoft Money (or Quicken if you prefer) and I can see in advance what bills are coming.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>James, this is standard practice with recurring billing. Everybody does it, Match.com, Xbox Live, internet service providers, etc. But they&#8217;ll almost always refund you if you call and cancel even after you&#8217;ve been charged.</p>
<p>You&#8217;ll also most likely get notified a few weeks before they do it.</p>
<p>Anyway, after what I just went through, I&#8217;d much rather get charged $49.99 a year on an automatic schedule than forget to renew and wind up going the torture of an infestation again.</p>
<p>Besides, I use Microsoft Money (or Quicken if you prefer) and I can see in advance what bills are coming.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Nichols</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2006/04/29/windows_live_on_1/#comment-33643</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Nichols</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Apr 2006 12:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/04/29/windows_live_on_1#comment-33643</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;I had problems with one care.  I thought it was the greatest thing in the world.  Automatic backup, defrag, firewall, antivirus, spyware with defender.  Until i did another check for viruses and spyware with another program.   i do this every 6 months or so to make sure my current tools do what they claim. I found the software itself was infected with a virus as well as large build up of spyware.   I switched to symantec and an alternate spyware choice and have never been happier.  Perhaps this is an isolated case but I would caution anyone using to check with another tool to ensure it is doing what it claims.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>I had problems with one care.  I thought it was the greatest thing in the world.  Automatic backup, defrag, firewall, antivirus, spyware with defender.  Until i did another check for viruses and spyware with another program.   i do this every 6 months or so to make sure my current tools do what they claim. I found the software itself was infected with a virus as well as large build up of spyware.   I switched to symantec and an alternate spyware choice and have never been happier.  Perhaps this is an isolated case but I would caution anyone using to check with another tool to ensure it is doing what it claims.
</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jk</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2006/04/29/windows_live_on_1/#comment-33644</link>
		<dc:creator>jk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Apr 2006 09:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/04/29/windows_live_on_1#comment-33644</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Matt, OneCare&#039;s spyware protection is pretty good and recently it gave the option to integrate Defender 2 with it.  I did that so OneCare is now running Defender for the spyware protection.  I used PerfectDisk until trying OneCare&#039;s defrag which I find to be very fast.  It is also easy to keep working while the defrag is running, something I couldn&#039;t easily do with PerfectDisk.  It&#039;s probably not as effective a defrag as PerfectDisk but since it&#039;s so fast I find I run the defrag more often.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Matt, OneCare&#8217;s spyware protection is pretty good and recently it gave the option to integrate Defender 2 with it.  I did that so OneCare is now running Defender for the spyware protection.  I used PerfectDisk until trying OneCare&#8217;s defrag which I find to be very fast.  It is also easy to keep working while the defrag is running, something I couldn&#8217;t easily do with PerfectDisk.  It&#8217;s probably not as effective a defrag as PerfectDisk but since it&#8217;s so fast I find I run the defrag more often.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Smith</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2006/04/29/windows_live_on_1/#comment-33646</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Apr 2006 09:49:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/04/29/windows_live_on_1#comment-33646</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;James,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;How does OneCare&#039;s spyware protection compare to Windows Defender?  Is it essentially the same thing, or do I get enhanced protection from OneCare?  Also, is there any advantage to using OneCare&#039;s defrag utility over PerfectDisk? &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>James,</p>
<p>How does OneCare&#8217;s spyware protection compare to Windows Defender?  Is it essentially the same thing, or do I get enhanced protection from OneCare?  Also, is there any advantage to using OneCare&#8217;s defrag utility over PerfectDisk? </p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Windows Live Onecare Virus Upate</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2006/04/29/windows_live_on_1/#comment-33649</link>
		<dc:creator>Windows Live Onecare Virus Upate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Apr 2006 09:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/04/29/windows_live_on_1#comment-33649</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Help Restore My Credit</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2006/04/29/windows_live_on_1/#comment-33651</link>
		<dc:creator>Help Restore My Credit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Apr 2006 09:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/04/29/windows_live_on_1#comment-33651</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manual Removal Spyware</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2006/04/29/windows_live_on_1/#comment-33652</link>
		<dc:creator>Manual Removal Spyware</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Apr 2006 09:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/04/29/windows_live_on_1#comment-33652</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spyware Program</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2006/04/29/windows_live_on_1/#comment-33653</link>
		<dc:creator>Spyware Program</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Apr 2006 09:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/04/29/windows_live_on_1#comment-33653</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
