Comments on: HP’s nc2400 ultra-portable notebook http://jkontherun.com/2006/05/12/hps_nc2400_ultr/ Using mobile devices since they weighed 30 lbs. Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:10:32 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: James Tenniswood http://jkontherun.com/2006/05/12/hps_nc2400_ultr/#comment-33362 James Tenniswood Sat, 13 May 2006 04:12:37 +0000 http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/05/12/hps_nc2400_ultr#comment-33362 <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Oh come on hp, do a tablet version of this!<br /> How cool would a 12inch widescreen tablet for under 1.5kg be? They even do one without a dvdrw.</p> <p>You know it makes sense!</p></div>

Oh come on hp, do a tablet version of this!
How cool would a 12inch widescreen tablet for under 1.5kg be? They even do one without a dvdrw.

You know it makes sense!

]]> By: Ben Drawbaugh http://jkontherun.com/2006/05/12/hps_nc2400_ultr/#comment-33364 Ben Drawbaugh Fri, 12 May 2006 12:38:13 +0000 http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/05/12/hps_nc2400_ultr#comment-33364 <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>What is wrong with calling a 12" screen an ultra-portable notebook? Don't forget the notebook part and don't confuse it with Tablet. I know I don't have to tell you the difference between a tablet and a notebook. It also isn't a ultra-portable device. </p> <p>I agree, without the word notebook it isn't very ultra-portable. </p></div>

What is wrong with calling a 12″ screen an ultra-portable notebook? Don’t forget the notebook part and don’t confuse it with Tablet. I know I don’t have to tell you the difference between a tablet and a notebook. It also isn’t a ultra-portable device.

I agree, without the word notebook it isn’t very ultra-portable.

]]> By: e http://jkontherun.com/2006/05/12/hps_nc2400_ultr/#comment-33366 e Fri, 12 May 2006 09:01:00 +0000 http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/05/12/hps_nc2400_ultr#comment-33366 <strong></strong>

]]>