<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sony UX-50 trumps UMPCs before they even get going</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jkontherun.com/2006/06/14/sony_ux50_trump/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jkontherun.com/2006/06/14/sony_ux50_trump/</link>
	<description>Using mobile devices since they weighed 30 lbs.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:08:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ben Reierson</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2006/06/14/sony_ux50_trump/#comment-32072</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Reierson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 14:13:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/06/14/sony_ux50_trump#comment-32072</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;If the UX is anything like the U70,U750P there is no way you&#039;ll be able to upgrade the memory. In fact, I think the memory might be soldered on in the UX. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So what I&#039;d really lik eto see is a benchmark of a 1GB Q1 vs. a stock UX. Even better, show them running Vista.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>If the UX is anything like the U70,U750P there is no way you&#8217;ll be able to upgrade the memory. In fact, I think the memory might be soldered on in the UX. </p>
<p>So what I&#8217;d really lik eto see is a benchmark of a 1GB Q1 vs. a stock UX. Even better, show them running Vista.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brock</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2006/06/14/sony_ux50_trump/#comment-32074</link>
		<dc:creator>brock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 13:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/06/14/sony_ux50_trump#comment-32074</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;I was reading a while back when Kevin took apart his Sammy Q1 and upgraded the memory to a gig. Would such an upgrade be possible in the new Sony UPC&#039;s? upping it from 512 to a gig would definetly make this thing even more of a powerhouse and I imagine it would open up a range of possiblities (perhaps a little gaming would be in order with the shared graphics now taking a smaller piece of the ram pie) also this could make photoshop and other ram intensive apps run a little nicer. any ideas?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;B&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>I was reading a while back when Kevin took apart his Sammy Q1 and upgraded the memory to a gig. Would such an upgrade be possible in the new Sony UPC&#8217;s? upping it from 512 to a gig would definetly make this thing even more of a powerhouse and I imagine it would open up a range of possiblities (perhaps a little gaming would be in order with the shared graphics now taking a smaller piece of the ram pie) also this could make photoshop and other ram intensive apps run a little nicer. any ideas?</p>
<p>B</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jk</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2006/06/14/sony_ux50_trump/#comment-32075</link>
		<dc:creator>jk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 12:08:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/06/14/sony_ux50_trump#comment-32075</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;The UX I have shows exceptional signal strength, as good as my U50 and Tablet PC.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>The UX I have shows exceptional signal strength, as good as my U50 and Tablet PC.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: palmsolo</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2006/06/14/sony_ux50_trump/#comment-32076</link>
		<dc:creator>palmsolo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 11:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/06/14/sony_ux50_trump#comment-32076</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;I LOVED my CLIE UX50 and imagine the Sony VAIO UX devices are constructed of the same high quality with very cool features. However, a couple of things in the review cause me to pause and think that the Samsung Q1 is a smarter purchase for me personally. I don&#039;t think either of the cameras is worth using as I never use a webcam and have much better cameras on my phones. While a thumb keyboard is nice, I look at the Q1 as an extremely portable slate Tablet PC and with ritePen&#039;s ability to write anywhere on the display it does well in this regard. I was also concerned with the comment that the UX has &quot;relatively weak Wi-Fi performance&quot;. On the Samsung Q1 I am testing right now I was actually picking up WiFi hotspots that others using Dell and HP laptops could not sniff out and am very impressed with its range.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I was thinking of saving for the UX, but with the Q1 and other UMPC devices at about half the cost I am sticking with them for now since they meet my needs.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>I LOVED my CLIE UX50 and imagine the Sony VAIO UX devices are constructed of the same high quality with very cool features. However, a couple of things in the review cause me to pause and think that the Samsung Q1 is a smarter purchase for me personally. I don&#8217;t think either of the cameras is worth using as I never use a webcam and have much better cameras on my phones. While a thumb keyboard is nice, I look at the Q1 as an extremely portable slate Tablet PC and with ritePen&#8217;s ability to write anywhere on the display it does well in this regard. I was also concerned with the comment that the UX has &#8220;relatively weak Wi-Fi performance&#8221;. On the Samsung Q1 I am testing right now I was actually picking up WiFi hotspots that others using Dell and HP laptops could not sniff out and am very impressed with its range.</p>
<p>I was thinking of saving for the UX, but with the Q1 and other UMPC devices at about half the cost I am sticking with them for now since they meet my needs.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Venini</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2006/06/14/sony_ux50_trump/#comment-32077</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Venini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 10:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/06/14/sony_ux50_trump#comment-32077</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;Aren&#039;t UMPCs suppose to be cheap consumer devices? The Sony is in it&#039;s own class called UPC.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;How can Sony trump UMPCs, when it hasn&#039;t made a UMPC?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Sony is $1799 vs. UMPC $900 - $1100.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You cannot compare the UX50 tot he current UMPCs. I&#039;m not saying the Sony UPC is bad in anyway, it looks sweet. But to me, it&#039;s not a UMPC.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Aren&#8217;t UMPCs suppose to be cheap consumer devices? The Sony is in it&#8217;s own class called UPC.</p>
<p>How can Sony trump UMPCs, when it hasn&#8217;t made a UMPC?</p>
<p>Sony is $1799 vs. UMPC $900 &#8211; $1100.</p>
<p>You cannot compare the UX50 tot he current UMPCs. I&#8217;m not saying the Sony UPC is bad in anyway, it looks sweet. But to me, it&#8217;s not a UMPC.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buy phentermine on line.</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2006/06/14/sony_ux50_trump/#comment-32078</link>
		<dc:creator>Buy phentermine on line.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 09:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/06/14/sony_ux50_trump#comment-32078</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
