<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Samsung A990 with 3.2 MP cam shoots to Verizon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jkontherun.com/2006/07/06/samsung_a990_wi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jkontherun.com/2006/07/06/samsung_a990_wi/</link>
	<description>Using mobile devices since they weighed 30 lbs.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: dok do is our land</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2006/07/06/samsung_a990_wi/#comment-31479</link>
		<dc:creator>dok do is our land</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 00:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/07/06/samsung_a990_wi#comment-31479</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;You could get this phone for free at any korea town wireless phone dealer in L.A. or N.Y. N.Y.&lt;br /&gt;
for free or just $50 for sign a 1 year contract not like other autherized dealer which you got to pay $350 after rebate and for 2 years contract.  So good hunting and get some.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>You could get this phone for free at any korea town wireless phone dealer in L.A. or N.Y. N.Y.<br />
for free or just $50 for sign a 1 year contract not like other autherized dealer which you got to pay $350 after rebate and for 2 years contract.  So good hunting and get some.
</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2006/07/06/samsung_a990_wi/#comment-31481</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 17:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/07/06/samsung_a990_wi#comment-31481</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;I have been able to find a handful of photos taken with this camera online by people who are just now getting this phone, and they ARE decent.  I&#039;ve been into digicams for quite some time and my opinion is that the 3MP A990 takes images that are the same quality as the mid-range 1.3MP consumer digital cameras did maybe 3-4 years ago.  The autofocus does take sharper pics than when you use it without autofocus (but users comment on a 2 second shutter lag when using the autofocus).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I tinkered with some of the pics and was able to make presentable 4x6 prints from them once I post processed (I use Paint Shop Pro), so I think unless someone wants perfection, many will be satisfied with the image quality if all they want are web shots and small print shots.  Just don&#039;t rely on it to be as fast ad a &quot;real&quot; digital camera, and remember, no zoom.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>I have been able to find a handful of photos taken with this camera online by people who are just now getting this phone, and they ARE decent.  I&#8217;ve been into digicams for quite some time and my opinion is that the 3MP A990 takes images that are the same quality as the mid-range 1.3MP consumer digital cameras did maybe 3-4 years ago.  The autofocus does take sharper pics than when you use it without autofocus (but users comment on a 2 second shutter lag when using the autofocus).</p>
<p>I tinkered with some of the pics and was able to make presentable 4&#215;6 prints from them once I post processed (I use Paint Shop Pro), so I think unless someone wants perfection, many will be satisfied with the image quality if all they want are web shots and small print shots.  Just don&#8217;t rely on it to be as fast ad a &#8220;real&#8221; digital camera, and remember, no zoom.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2006/07/06/samsung_a990_wi/#comment-31482</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 20:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/07/06/samsung_a990_wi#comment-31482</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;WOW! What an awesome piece of equipment! Finally, a great phone AND great camera in one nice package!&lt;br /&gt;
This phone just feels good in your hand. It is a great fit around your face when talking on the handset. The speakerphone is super loud...enough volume to be able to hear someone while driving down a freeway.&lt;br /&gt;
And the camera...fantastic! Of course, my daughter just bought a compact Nikon 6.0 megapixel camera and it takes awesome shots...BUT...she doesn&#039;t have a phone on it!&lt;br /&gt;
The A990 camera is 3.2 mp, and is wonderful, PRINTABLE quality. It even has autofocus...which will take just a little getting used to, but worth it!&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, the A990 is a little pricey, but have you seen what just that quality camera sells for without a phone?&lt;br /&gt;
This phone is worth every penny! Thanks Samsung! Now if Verizon would loosen up the Bluetooth OBEX a bit, I would rate it a 12 on a scale of 10!!&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>WOW! What an awesome piece of equipment! Finally, a great phone AND great camera in one nice package!<br />
This phone just feels good in your hand. It is a great fit around your face when talking on the handset. The speakerphone is super loud&#8230;enough volume to be able to hear someone while driving down a freeway.<br />
And the camera&#8230;fantastic! Of course, my daughter just bought a compact Nikon 6.0 megapixel camera and it takes awesome shots&#8230;BUT&#8230;she doesn&#8217;t have a phone on it!<br />
The A990 camera is 3.2 mp, and is wonderful, PRINTABLE quality. It even has autofocus&#8230;which will take just a little getting used to, but worth it!<br />
Yes, the A990 is a little pricey, but have you seen what just that quality camera sells for without a phone?<br />
This phone is worth every penny! Thanks Samsung! Now if Verizon would loosen up the Bluetooth OBEX a bit, I would rate it a 12 on a scale of 10!!</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan A. Reiter</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2006/07/06/samsung_a990_wi/#comment-31484</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan A. Reiter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2006 20:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/07/06/samsung_a990_wi#comment-31484</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s great that Verizon has launched a 3.2 megapixel camera phone.  But just remember:  The number of pixels is not the sole measurement of image quality....especially with camera phones.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Alas, camera phones typically produce images that are significantly worse than digital cameras.  The quality of the lens, sensor, internal software, flash, etc. are generally worse than a typical camera phone.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Cost constraints + size constraints + ruggedness constraints are killers for camera phones when it comes to having components comparable to digital cameras.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m a huge fan of camera phones (for photos and taking videos), but no one should assume the new Samsung produces images that are comparable to a digital camera.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s certainly not impossible to create a camera phone that takes great photos, but most take mediocre images at best.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>It&#8217;s great that Verizon has launched a 3.2 megapixel camera phone.  But just remember:  The number of pixels is not the sole measurement of image quality&#8230;.especially with camera phones.</p>
<p>Alas, camera phones typically produce images that are significantly worse than digital cameras.  The quality of the lens, sensor, internal software, flash, etc. are generally worse than a typical camera phone.</p>
<p>Cost constraints + size constraints + ruggedness constraints are killers for camera phones when it comes to having components comparable to digital cameras.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a huge fan of camera phones (for photos and taking videos), but no one should assume the new Samsung produces images that are comparable to a digital camera.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s certainly not impossible to create a camera phone that takes great photos, but most take mediocre images at best.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
