<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Samsung Q1 versions: one with flash drive and one with Via C7-M?!?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jkontherun.com/2006/08/21/new_samsung_q1_/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jkontherun.com/2006/08/21/new_samsung_q1_/</link>
	<description>Using mobile devices since they weighed 30 lbs.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:10:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kevin C. Tofel</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2006/08/21/new_samsung_q1_/#comment-30363</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin C. Tofel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 13:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/08/21/new_samsung_q1_#comment-30363</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Tough to say as detailed specs aren&#039;t readily available. The eo V7110 uses a 1.0 GHz Via C7-M processor. According to Via&#039;s C7-M product page, the chip is capable of clock cycles between 1.0 and 2.0 GHz. 2 would be nice... ;) See: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.via.com.tw/en/products/processors/c7-m/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.via.com.tw/en/products/processors/c7-m/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Tough to say as detailed specs aren&#8217;t readily available. The eo V7110 uses a 1.0 GHz Via C7-M processor. According to Via&#8217;s C7-M product page, the chip is capable of clock cycles between 1.0 and 2.0 GHz. 2 would be nice&#8230; <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  See: <a href="http://www.via.com.tw/en/products/processors/c7-m/" rel="nofollow">http://www.via.com.tw/en/products/processors/c7-m/</a></p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jk</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2006/08/21/new_samsung_q1_/#comment-30366</link>
		<dc:creator>jk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 13:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/08/21/new_samsung_q1_#comment-30366</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;I believe that the M-7 Via processor is the new one that ships in the DualCor.  It runs at 1.5 GHz and is faster than the one used in the eo.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>I believe that the M-7 Via processor is the new one that ships in the DualCor.  It runs at 1.5 GHz and is faster than the one used in the eo.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Russell</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2006/08/21/new_samsung_q1_/#comment-30369</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Russell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 12:05:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/08/21/new_samsung_q1_#comment-30369</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;So is this new processor one of the new low-power chips that is going to bring us both lower prices and better battery life? &lt;br /&gt;
(Or is  it the AMD chip similar to the current Q1 versions?)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As far as cost for a flash drive, you can get a 4gig SD card for ~$80 in single quantities, so maybe they could put together 8 of them for a 32gig drive at the cost of about $400 or less wholesale, plus enclosure costs to combine them. That would still be small enough, wouldn&#039;t it?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But I thought flash cards had limited read/write cycles before they fail. Wouldn&#039;t that be a problem for use as a main hard drive?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>So is this new processor one of the new low-power chips that is going to bring us both lower prices and better battery life? <br />
(Or is  it the AMD chip similar to the current Q1 versions?)</p>
<p>As far as cost for a flash drive, you can get a 4gig SD card for ~$80 in single quantities, so maybe they could put together 8 of them for a 32gig drive at the cost of about $400 or less wholesale, plus enclosure costs to combine them. That would still be small enough, wouldn&#8217;t it?</p>
<p>But I thought flash cards had limited read/write cycles before they fail. Wouldn&#8217;t that be a problem for use as a main hard drive?</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin C. Tofel</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2006/08/21/new_samsung_q1_/#comment-30372</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin C. Tofel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 09:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/08/21/new_samsung_q1_#comment-30372</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Good to hear Steve! I haven&#039;t been watching the eo news as closely I should; thanks for the update!&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Good to hear Steve! I haven&#8217;t been watching the eo news as closely I should; thanks for the update!</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Paine</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2006/08/21/new_samsung_q1_/#comment-30374</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Paine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 09:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/08/21/new_samsung_q1_#comment-30374</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&quot;Isn’t this the CPU that is contributing to battery life issues on the eo?&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;No. Its the CPU that is on the eo that *had* the design problems. (now solved)&lt;br /&gt;
The VIA processor wasn&#039;t responsible for the battery life issues on the eo.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Just had to put that one straight!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Cheers&lt;br /&gt;
Steve.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>&#8220;Isn’t this the CPU that is contributing to battery life issues on the eo?&#8221;</p>
<p>No. Its the CPU that is on the eo that *had* the design problems. (now solved)<br />
The VIA processor wasn&#8217;t responsible for the battery life issues on the eo.</p>
<p>Just had to put that one straight!</p>
<p>Cheers<br />
Steve.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
