<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Apps for Your Domain launching this week ; ads in the workplace?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jkontherun.com/2006/08/28/google_apps_for/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jkontherun.com/2006/08/28/google_apps_for/</link>
	<description>Using mobile devices since they weighed 30 lbs.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 18:15:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Josh Einstein</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2006/08/28/google_apps_for/#comment-30171</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Einstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 07:35:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/08/28/google_apps_for#comment-30171</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;I will definitely never use my web browser for tasks like this. I&#039;ve got a dual core processor, 2gb of ram, a huge hard disk, and fast video card. Why would I relegate this powerful machine to what amounts to the modern equivalent of a dumb terminal?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I am not opposed to data storage services, but I think Microsoft has the right idea with Sharepoint. SharePoint lets me decide if *I* want to host the data or if I want to trust someone else to do it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;One thing SharePoint is lacking which I think they are addressing in 2007 is offline synchronization. I need the ability to unplug and take my stuff with me, yet I appreciate the confidence of knowing an always up-to-date copy is back at the office on the server and available to me over the web if needed in a pinch. However, with th Tablet PC, I rarely find myself in a situation where I need to use someone else&#039;s computer to access my data on the web.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>I will definitely never use my web browser for tasks like this. I&#8217;ve got a dual core processor, 2gb of ram, a huge hard disk, and fast video card. Why would I relegate this powerful machine to what amounts to the modern equivalent of a dumb terminal?</p>
<p>I am not opposed to data storage services, but I think Microsoft has the right idea with Sharepoint. SharePoint lets me decide if *I* want to host the data or if I want to trust someone else to do it.</p>
<p>One thing SharePoint is lacking which I think they are addressing in 2007 is offline synchronization. I need the ability to unplug and take my stuff with me, yet I appreciate the confidence of knowing an always up-to-date copy is back at the office on the server and available to me over the web if needed in a pinch. However, with th Tablet PC, I rarely find myself in a situation where I need to use someone else&#8217;s computer to access my data on the web.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web Hosting Package</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2006/08/28/google_apps_for/#comment-30172</link>
		<dc:creator>Web Hosting Package</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 07:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/08/28/google_apps_for#comment-30172</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
