<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Times Reader looks slick, but Arrington appears unimpressed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jkontherun.com/2006/08/31/times_reader_lo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jkontherun.com/2006/08/31/times_reader_lo/</link>
	<description>Using mobile devices since they weighed 30 lbs.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 10:54:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jk</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2006/08/31/times_reader_lo/#comment-30073</link>
		<dc:creator>jk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 19:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/08/31/times_reader_lo#comment-30073</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;I think NewStand is excellent and was wondering the same earlier when I first saw this post. NewStand works with many papers, too.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>I think NewStand is excellent and was wondering the same earlier when I first saw this post. NewStand works with many papers, too.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pam</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2006/08/31/times_reader_lo/#comment-30075</link>
		<dc:creator>Pam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 18:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/08/31/times_reader_lo#comment-30075</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;James,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;d be interested in your thoughts to the question I posted at the NY Times: How is this different from my ability to download the electronic edition of the NY Times via NewsStand? I do this daily and it works very well. I realize with the Times Reader I could do this for free, but other than that, what are the benefits as you see them? For me, the Times Reader will only be interesting if I can download the full daily paper (or even better, to download particular sections that I read as I do now).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thanks,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>James,</p>
<p>I&#8217;d be interested in your thoughts to the question I posted at the NY Times: How is this different from my ability to download the electronic edition of the NY Times via NewsStand? I do this daily and it works very well. I realize with the Times Reader I could do this for free, but other than that, what are the benefits as you see them? For me, the Times Reader will only be interesting if I can download the full daily paper (or even better, to download particular sections that I read as I do now).</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Microsoft Times Reader impresses blog folks</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2006/08/31/times_reader_lo/#comment-30077</link>
		<dc:creator>Microsoft Times Reader impresses blog folks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 14:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/08/31/times_reader_lo#comment-30077</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
