Comments on: 32 GB flash drive in your choice of 1.8 or 2.5-inches just $1799; 64 GB coming soon http://jkontherun.com/2006/09/05/32_gb_drive_in_/ Using mobile devices since they weighed 30 lbs. Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:46:14 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: pierro78 http://jkontherun.com/2006/09/05/32_gb_drive_in_/#comment-29981 pierro78 Wed, 06 Sep 2006 11:53:33 +0000 http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/09/05/32_gb_drive_in_#comment-29981 <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <p>Given that a 4GB SD card is less than $60 I am wondering why nobody builds a 1.8" IDE enclosure that would contain 8 (?) of these ?? ... this would be much cheaper for the final customer ... and with raid 5 functionality you could probably upgrade the 4GB SD cards to 8GB SD cards without losing any data ...</p> </div>

Given that a 4GB SD card is less than $60 I am wondering why nobody builds a 1.8″ IDE enclosure that would contain 8 (?) of these ?? … this would be much cheaper for the final customer … and with raid 5 functionality you could probably upgrade the 4GB SD cards to 8GB SD cards without losing any data …

]]> By: Tyler http://jkontherun.com/2006/09/05/32_gb_drive_in_/#comment-29983 Tyler Tue, 05 Sep 2006 18:02:50 +0000 http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/09/05/32_gb_drive_in_#comment-29983 <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <p>Not to mention you can buy a Samsung Q1 with a flash drive on ebay for $2,400! You could take the flash drive out of that and make a hefty profit and have a cheap samsung q1! Of course, you would need to replace the SSD with a normal drive.</p> </div>

Not to mention you can buy a Samsung Q1 with a flash drive on ebay for $2,400! You could take the flash drive out of that and make a hefty profit and have a cheap samsung q1! Of course, you would need to replace the SSD with a normal drive.

]]> By: Uk online dating. http://jkontherun.com/2006/09/05/32_gb_drive_in_/#comment-29986 Uk online dating. Tue, 05 Sep 2006 15:17:04 +0000 http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/09/05/32_gb_drive_in_#comment-29986 <strong></strong>

]]>