<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Origami Touch Improvements: do you use &#8216;em?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jkontherun.com/2006/09/19/origami_touch_t/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jkontherun.com/2006/09/19/origami_touch_t/</link>
	<description>Using mobile devices since they weighed 30 lbs.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:10:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kevin C. Tofel</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2006/09/19/origami_touch_t/#comment-29728</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin C. Tofel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 09:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/09/19/origami_touch_t#comment-29728</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;Great question / solicitation for feedback Dustin! Here&#039;s my rundown, which of course is a personal choice:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;1. Wider scrollbars. I do make use of these; they definitely make the user experience more positive, especially when not using a stylus. In the future, it might be worthwhile if the actual width were easily customizable by the user within the TE. Perhaps a few set choices of widths could be provided for a wider (no pun intended) range of widths.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;2. Larger screen text. I tend to play with font sizes (and DPI) directly through the Display Properties dialog in XP, however, I see no issue with having this change in the TE.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;3. Single tap. Unlike most, I do keep this feature active. Less taps means more productivity over time. For instances when I need to see the properties of a file, I simply tap away from the icon and drag my stylus to the file. After a second, I get the right-click menu without activating the file.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;4. Thumbnail view of files. I&#039;m OK with this in general as it better supports #3 above. Users can always adjust to Detail or any other view. I tend to use Thumbnail the most, but again, that&#039;s personal preference.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;5. Fewer Start men programs; I&#039;m all for this feature and you can always change as needed very simply.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;6. Applications menu: not a fan of the scrolling program menu, so I change that back. I&#039;d prefer to better manage my program shortcut groups and have them all on one screen; difficult but doable.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;7. IE full screen. Again, not a fan, but conceptually this is good for most folks to maximize the screen.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Although any of these settings can be modified outside the TE, I&#039;d love to see the option to modify / add / remove from WITHIN the TE, which shouldn&#039;t be difficult to do; all of the functionality is available, but you have to go different places to modify. I&#039;d also like to recommend that the Tools app itself be a higher level menu item. It&#039;s a safe bet that not every UMPC owner knows about this as it feels hidden from a user standpoint. Perhaps it can be a sub-menu under &quot;Microsoft Touch Pack for Tablet PC&quot;?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Great question / solicitation for feedback Dustin! Here&#8217;s my rundown, which of course is a personal choice:</p>
<p>1. Wider scrollbars. I do make use of these; they definitely make the user experience more positive, especially when not using a stylus. In the future, it might be worthwhile if the actual width were easily customizable by the user within the TE. Perhaps a few set choices of widths could be provided for a wider (no pun intended) range of widths.</p>
<p>2. Larger screen text. I tend to play with font sizes (and DPI) directly through the Display Properties dialog in XP, however, I see no issue with having this change in the TE.</p>
<p>3. Single tap. Unlike most, I do keep this feature active. Less taps means more productivity over time. For instances when I need to see the properties of a file, I simply tap away from the icon and drag my stylus to the file. After a second, I get the right-click menu without activating the file.</p>
<p>4. Thumbnail view of files. I&#8217;m OK with this in general as it better supports #3 above. Users can always adjust to Detail or any other view. I tend to use Thumbnail the most, but again, that&#8217;s personal preference.</p>
<p>5. Fewer Start men programs; I&#8217;m all for this feature and you can always change as needed very simply.</p>
<p>6. Applications menu: not a fan of the scrolling program menu, so I change that back. I&#8217;d prefer to better manage my program shortcut groups and have them all on one screen; difficult but doable.</p>
<p>7. IE full screen. Again, not a fan, but conceptually this is good for most folks to maximize the screen.</p>
<p>Although any of these settings can be modified outside the TE, I&#8217;d love to see the option to modify / add / remove from WITHIN the TE, which shouldn&#8217;t be difficult to do; all of the functionality is available, but you have to go different places to modify. I&#8217;d also like to recommend that the Tools app itself be a higher level menu item. It&#8217;s a safe bet that not every UMPC owner knows about this as it feels hidden from a user standpoint. Perhaps it can be a sub-menu under &#8220;Microsoft Touch Pack for Tablet PC&#8221;?
</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
