<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 800 x 480 cellphone screens: overkill or good idea?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jkontherun.com/2006/12/28/800_x_480_cellp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jkontherun.com/2006/12/28/800_x_480_cellp/</link>
	<description>Using mobile devices since they weighed 30 lbs.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 11:47:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: DeCat</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2006/12/28/800_x_480_cellp/#comment-27392</link>
		<dc:creator>DeCat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 22:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/12/28/800_x_480_cellp#comment-27392</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;A high res screen becomes more and more important as we move towards a more friendly (and universal) mobile UI)&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>A high res screen becomes more and more important as we move towards a more friendly (and universal) mobile UI)</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spads</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2006/12/28/800_x_480_cellp/#comment-27393</link>
		<dc:creator>Spads</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 05:38:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/12/28/800_x_480_cellp#comment-27393</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;The ratio between screen size and resolution becomes smaller, but you point the good question : readibility (don&#039;t know if it is correct in english, sorry).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;On my Sony U3 (oldie, but goodie) I have 1024x768 pixels on a 6.4&quot; screen : it is nice and good, but smaller text size would not be better for me...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>The ratio between screen size and resolution becomes smaller, but you point the good question : readibility (don&#8217;t know if it is correct in english, sorry).</p>
<p>On my Sony U3 (oldie, but goodie) I have 1024&#215;768 pixels on a 6.4&#8243; screen : it is nice and good, but smaller text size would not be better for me&#8230;</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Cane</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2006/12/28/800_x_480_cellp/#comment-27394</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Cane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 23:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/12/28/800_x_480_cellp#comment-27394</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; ripping out my hair &lt;&lt;&lt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;VEGA VEGA VEGA!!!!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>>>> ripping out my hair < <<</p>
</p>
<p>VEGA VEGA VEGA!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeffgrado</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2006/12/28/800_x_480_cellp/#comment-27396</link>
		<dc:creator>jeffgrado</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:44:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/12/28/800_x_480_cellp#comment-27396</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;I agree, just use a larger font.  I&#039;m guessing that a higher res means more energy will be used, but at that size of a screen it&#039;s probably not very noticeable on battery life.  If the software is good at scaling images, I see no problem with such a high resolution.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>I agree, just use a larger font.  I&#8217;m guessing that a higher res means more energy will be used, but at that size of a screen it&#8217;s probably not very noticeable on battery life.  If the software is good at scaling images, I see no problem with such a high resolution.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2006/12/28/800_x_480_cellp/#comment-27398</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 15:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/12/28/800_x_480_cellp#comment-27398</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;Just make your fonts larger!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You know, I think that higher resolutions are actually a good direction to go in. You might think it&#039;s wasteful but if we can double or quadruple the resolution at the same cost point (granted tis will take a while), it will be worth it. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I think most people are trained to think that higher resolutions mean smaller and harder to read icons and text, but if the fonts and images take the same amount of screen space but just at a higher crisper resolution, then we have nothing to lose. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Hopefully, in the future, operating systems start thinking in terms of inches or milimeters to define the sizes of text and images on screen and when it comes time to get rendered it looks for the dpi of the display in order to tell how to scale it for the final rendering.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;in this way, a 800x480 resolution on a 2.5 inch display would just render the screen at 321 dpi and a 240x320 display would render it at 137 dpi.    &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p /&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Just make your fonts larger!</p>
<p>You know, I think that higher resolutions are actually a good direction to go in. You might think it&#8217;s wasteful but if we can double or quadruple the resolution at the same cost point (granted tis will take a while), it will be worth it. </p>
<p>I think most people are trained to think that higher resolutions mean smaller and harder to read icons and text, but if the fonts and images take the same amount of screen space but just at a higher crisper resolution, then we have nothing to lose. </p>
<p>Hopefully, in the future, operating systems start thinking in terms of inches or milimeters to define the sizes of text and images on screen and when it comes time to get rendered it looks for the dpi of the display in order to tell how to scale it for the final rendering.  </p>
<p>in this way, a 800&#215;480 resolution on a 2.5 inch display would just render the screen at 321 dpi and a 240&#215;320 display would render it at 137 dpi.    </p>
<p />
<p>
</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: e</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2006/12/28/800_x_480_cellp/#comment-27401</link>
		<dc:creator>e</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 14:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/12/28/800_x_480_cellp#comment-27401</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
