<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fujitsu UMPC details emerge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jkontherun.com/2007/05/16/fujitsu_umpc_de/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jkontherun.com/2007/05/16/fujitsu_umpc_de/</link>
	<description>Using mobile devices since they weighed 30 lbs.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:10:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rabidmax</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2007/05/16/fujitsu_umpc_de/#comment-23149</link>
		<dc:creator>Rabidmax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 18:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2007/05/16/fujitsu_umpc_de#comment-23149</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;Actually the specs look very nice according the Fujitsu press release:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fujitsu.com/global/news/pr/archives/month/2007/20070516-01.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.fujitsu.com/global/news/pr/archives/month/2007/20070516-01.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Also, that screen, while only being 5.6&quot;, does indeed appear to be running at 1024x600 widescreen. Very nice. Hopefully someone will get their hands on one soon to let us know how it really performs!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Actually the specs look very nice according the Fujitsu press release:<br />
<a href="http://www.fujitsu.com/global/news/pr/archives/month/2007/20070516-01.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.fujitsu.com/global/news/pr/archives/month/2007/20070516-01.html</a></p>
<p>Also, that screen, while only being 5.6&#8243;, does indeed appear to be running at 1024&#215;600 widescreen. Very nice. Hopefully someone will get their hands on one soon to let us know how it really performs!</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: georgi55</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2007/05/16/fujitsu_umpc_de/#comment-23152</link>
		<dc:creator>georgi55</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 13:49:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2007/05/16/fujitsu_umpc_de#comment-23152</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;kamikun, actually if you look at the pictures the keys for switching between input mode are still there (in green letters) but there are no Japanese letters written on the keys.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>kamikun, actually if you look at the pictures the keys for switching between input mode are still there (in green letters) but there are no Japanese letters written on the keys.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler Arnold</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2007/05/16/fujitsu_umpc_de/#comment-23155</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler Arnold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 11:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2007/05/16/fujitsu_umpc_de#comment-23155</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;Really cool device. However, I think everyone is missing something.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I think it looks freakishly similar to the old Clie device(s) from Sony:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.brighthand.com/images/Sony_UX50_5.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.brighthand.com/images/Sony_UX50_5.jpg&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Do you guys agree? I loved that form factor...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Really cool device. However, I think everyone is missing something.</p>
<p>I think it looks freakishly similar to the old Clie device(s) from Sony:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.brighthand.com/images/Sony_UX50_5.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.brighthand.com/images/Sony_UX50_5.jpg</a></p>
<p>Do you guys agree? I loved that form factor&#8230;</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kamikun</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2007/05/16/fujitsu_umpc_de/#comment-23157</link>
		<dc:creator>kamikun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 08:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2007/05/16/fujitsu_umpc_de#comment-23157</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;PJE - I think the reason for some of the &quot;non-critical&quot; keys is that the Japanese release has to have a number of them to allow for all 53 Japanese &quot;letters&quot; (hiragana) to be fitted to the standard  keyboard.  Even though most Japanese spell out their typing phonetically in Romaji (Roman letters) everyone still expects the option of typing in straight Japanese too.&lt;br /&gt;
So, for the keyboards to be the same in both the West and in Japan, you&#039;re going to need those keys.  If you want a visual of what I&#039;m trying to say, take a look at these shots &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ne.jp/asahi/mayumi/watanabe/who/keybd/keybd.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.ne.jp/asahi/mayumi/watanabe/who/keybd/keybd.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
I&#039;m sure the same is true of the Korean release. Hangul has about the same number of &quot;syllabics&quot; as Japanese.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>PJE &#8211; I think the reason for some of the &#8220;non-critical&#8221; keys is that the Japanese release has to have a number of them to allow for all 53 Japanese &#8220;letters&#8221; (hiragana) to be fitted to the standard  keyboard.  Even though most Japanese spell out their typing phonetically in Romaji (Roman letters) everyone still expects the option of typing in straight Japanese too.<br />
So, for the keyboards to be the same in both the West and in Japan, you&#8217;re going to need those keys.  If you want a visual of what I&#8217;m trying to say, take a look at these shots <a href="http://www.ne.jp/asahi/mayumi/watanabe/who/keybd/keybd.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.ne.jp/asahi/mayumi/watanabe/who/keybd/keybd.htm</a><br />
I&#8217;m sure the same is true of the Korean release. Hangul has about the same number of &#8220;syllabics&#8221; as Japanese.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kamikun</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2007/05/16/fujitsu_umpc_de/#comment-23158</link>
		<dc:creator>kamikun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 07:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2007/05/16/fujitsu_umpc_de#comment-23158</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Looks like this is gonna be the first mainstream release of a UMPC for the Japanese market.  Check out the notice here &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wince.ne.jp/snap/cnBoard.asp?PID=2451&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.wince.ne.jp/snap/cnBoard.asp?PID=2451&lt;/a&gt; .  &lt;br /&gt;
There are two prices listed; one for a 512M and one for a 1G RAM configuration, 14,400 and 16,400 yen.  About $1200 and $1360 US.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Looks like this is gonna be the first mainstream release of a UMPC for the Japanese market.  Check out the notice here <a href="http://www.wince.ne.jp/snap/cnBoard.asp?PID=2451" rel="nofollow">http://www.wince.ne.jp/snap/cnBoard.asp?PID=2451</a> .  <br />
There are two prices listed; one for a 512M and one for a 1G RAM configuration, 14,400 and 16,400 yen.  About $1200 and $1360 US.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PJE</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2007/05/16/fujitsu_umpc_de/#comment-23159</link>
		<dc:creator>PJE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 07:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2007/05/16/fujitsu_umpc_de#comment-23159</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;Looks like a nice device.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Why can&#039;t manufacturers standardize on a new reduced size keyboard. I look at the keyboard on this device and see that a complete column of keys could be removed (resulting in wider keys for the remainder) if some of the non-critical punctuation were added to the letter keys with an option select key).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For this to work however there would need to be a standard layout to aid switching between devices.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Just a thought...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Looks like a nice device.</p>
<p>Why can&#8217;t manufacturers standardize on a new reduced size keyboard. I look at the keyboard on this device and see that a complete column of keys could be removed (resulting in wider keys for the remainder) if some of the non-critical punctuation were added to the letter keys with an option select key).</p>
<p>For this to work however there would need to be a standard layout to aid switching between devices.</p>
<p>Just a thought&#8230;</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
