<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HP iPAQ 210: you might see it in February, 2008. Or not.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jkontherun.com/2007/10/30/hp-ipaq-210-you/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jkontherun.com/2007/10/30/hp-ipaq-210-you/</link>
	<description>Using mobile devices since they weighed 30 lbs.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 03:49:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: follick</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2007/10/30/hp-ipaq-210-you/#comment-17011</link>
		<dc:creator>follick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 11:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2007/10/30/hp-ipaq-210-you#comment-17011</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;I&#039;ve been waiting for this device with great anticipation. I&#039;ve been watching the eeePC with interest also, but it&#039;s just too big for even me to wear all the time on my belt. A 2.8&quot; QVGA screen is not enough for me. I&#039;ve tried a Sony-UX, but the ergonomics are not great and the battery life is terrible. This device looks like it will work for me.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>I&#8217;ve been waiting for this device with great anticipation. I&#8217;ve been watching the eeePC with interest also, but it&#8217;s just too big for even me to wear all the time on my belt. A 2.8&#8243; QVGA screen is not enough for me. I&#8217;ve tried a Sony-UX, but the ergonomics are not great and the battery life is terrible. This device looks like it will work for me.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Cane</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2007/10/30/hp-ipaq-210-you/#comment-17014</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Cane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 09:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2007/10/30/hp-ipaq-210-you#comment-17014</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;If there is such a huge business demand for these, why the delay?  I think there is just about NO demand.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>If there is such a huge business demand for these, why the delay?  I think there is just about NO demand.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woadan</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2007/10/30/hp-ipaq-210-you/#comment-17015</link>
		<dc:creator>Woadan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 14:41:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2007/10/30/hp-ipaq-210-you#comment-17015</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;Let&#039;s be realistic, the innards of a PDA aren&#039;t significantly different from other similar devices, such as UMPCs. The most significant cost is the LCD screen. The 210 has a VGA screen, while the 110 has an SVGA. I&#039;d venture a cost of something like $250-300 for a decent current LCD screen.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I paid $400 for an iPAQ HX 4705, and it arrived from the eBay seller with a cracked LCD. The cost, about 2 years ago, was $250-275 for the SVGA LCD screen it had.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The tech has improved since then, so for a comparably modern screen, I&#039;m betting it is similar in cost.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Woadan&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Let&#8217;s be realistic, the innards of a PDA aren&#8217;t significantly different from other similar devices, such as UMPCs. The most significant cost is the LCD screen. The 210 has a VGA screen, while the 110 has an SVGA. I&#8217;d venture a cost of something like $250-300 for a decent current LCD screen.</p>
<p>I paid $400 for an iPAQ HX 4705, and it arrived from the eBay seller with a cracked LCD. The cost, about 2 years ago, was $250-275 for the SVGA LCD screen it had.</p>
<p>The tech has improved since then, so for a comparably modern screen, I&#8217;m betting it is similar in cost.</p>
<p>Woadan</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron J. Walker</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2007/10/30/hp-ipaq-210-you/#comment-17017</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron J. Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 13:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2007/10/30/hp-ipaq-210-you#comment-17017</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;Mike, I agree with you, PDAs are over priced. But at this point, I don&#039;t HP is ready to pull an Apple and make drastic price cuts. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;They seem to be aiming these at business customers and, for some reasons, they seem to think business customers don&#039;t mind paying a premium for things that Joe Average Consumer would laugh at.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Ala Microsoft and their ridiculous pricing schemes for Vista Ultimate and Office Enterprise (not counting the student discount).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;My two cents anyway.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Mike, I agree with you, PDAs are over priced. But at this point, I don&#8217;t HP is ready to pull an Apple and make drastic price cuts. </p>
<p>They seem to be aiming these at business customers and, for some reasons, they seem to think business customers don&#8217;t mind paying a premium for things that Joe Average Consumer would laugh at.</p>
<p>Ala Microsoft and their ridiculous pricing schemes for Vista Ultimate and Office Enterprise (not counting the student discount).</p>
<p>My two cents anyway.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Cane</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2007/10/30/hp-ipaq-210-you/#comment-17023</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Cane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 12:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2007/10/30/hp-ipaq-210-you#comment-17023</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;Look, get with reality.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Asus Eee = $400.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;PDA = $50-$100 value.  Period.  P.e.r.i.o.d.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Look, get with reality.</p>
<p>Asus Eee = $400.</p>
<p>PDA = $50-$100 value.  Period.  P.e.r.i.o.d.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
