<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HTC Shift reviews are popping out all over</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jkontherun.com/2007/12/01/htc-shift-revie-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jkontherun.com/2007/12/01/htc-shift-revie-2/</link>
	<description>Using mobile devices since they weighed 30 lbs.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 08:55:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: bluespapa</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2007/12/01/htc-shift-revie-2/#comment-16035</link>
		<dc:creator>bluespapa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 13:18:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2007/12/01/htc-shift-revie-2#comment-16035</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hugo Ortega was able to touchtype on it, and I learned long ago to to type on tiny keyboards with my Palms of various sorts.   But it also looks like the inking isn&#039;t any better and is probably worse than my Samsung Q1 so that the &quot;touch&quot; experience can be easier.   If that&#039;s right, that&#039;s a deal breaker for me. Very simply, newer devices must improve inking over current models or it&#039;s the worst of both worlds. The Fugitzu in that size with the tablet style flip screen didn&#039;t bother trying to put the palm rejection software they developed for the 1610, and I&#039;m mystified by that decision as they ended up with the worst of both worlds, lousy inking and and a difficult to use keyboard missing keys you expect to see.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I do appreciate the double processor and having instant on, but if inking is lousy it can&#039;t be useful for me. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Hugo Ortega was able to touchtype on it, and I learned long ago to to type on tiny keyboards with my Palms of various sorts.   But it also looks like the inking isn&#8217;t any better and is probably worse than my Samsung Q1 so that the &#8220;touch&#8221; experience can be easier.   If that&#8217;s right, that&#8217;s a deal breaker for me. Very simply, newer devices must improve inking over current models or it&#8217;s the worst of both worlds. The Fugitzu in that size with the tablet style flip screen didn&#8217;t bother trying to put the palm rejection software they developed for the 1610, and I&#8217;m mystified by that decision as they ended up with the worst of both worlds, lousy inking and and a difficult to use keyboard missing keys you expect to see.  </p>
<p>I do appreciate the double processor and having instant on, but if inking is lousy it can&#8217;t be useful for me. </p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
