<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Intel&#8217;s Atom: did you know&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jkontherun.com/2008/03/12/intels-atom-did/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jkontherun.com/2008/03/12/intels-atom-did/</link>
	<description>Using mobile devices since they weighed 30 lbs.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 04:27:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: scoobie</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2008/03/12/intels-atom-did/#comment-12198</link>
		<dc:creator>scoobie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/03/12/intels-atom-did#comment-12198</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Engadget had a story this week about a dual core atom chip available this year, that I assume would give enough power&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Engadget had a story this week about a dual core atom chip available this year, that I assume would give enough power</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Cane</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2008/03/12/intels-atom-did/#comment-12200</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Cane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:35:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/03/12/intels-atom-did#comment-12200</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;Eh, there are rumors around the Net about iPhone on Intel, as if that elementary prognostication merited some frikkin applause.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If we were to see it in anything *this* year, it&#039;d be an iPod Air.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And, dear god, maybe it *will* do the five hours the MacBook Air *can&#039;t*.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Eh, there are rumors around the Net about iPhone on Intel, as if that elementary prognostication merited some frikkin applause.</p>
<p>If we were to see it in anything *this* year, it&#8217;d be an iPod Air.</p>
<p>And, dear god, maybe it *will* do the five hours the MacBook Air *can&#8217;t*.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin C. Tofel</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2008/03/12/intels-atom-did/#comment-12204</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin C. Tofel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/03/12/intels-atom-did#comment-12204</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Yes, but as I said in that post, it&#039;s too early to judge the Atom. My expectation is that it will be powerful enough for Eee-like notebooks and lightweight OS handhelds. The obvious benefit is longer battery life. There will be usable devices for this chip, but not likely desktop-replacement types of devices. That&#039;s not what these are meant to power. I wouldn&#039;t be surprised to see this in a future version of the iPhone to be honest.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Yes, but as I said in that post, it&#8217;s too early to judge the Atom. My expectation is that it will be powerful enough for Eee-like notebooks and lightweight OS handhelds. The obvious benefit is longer battery life. There will be usable devices for this chip, but not likely desktop-replacement types of devices. That&#8217;s not what these are meant to power. I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised to see this in a future version of the iPhone to be honest.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Cane</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2008/03/12/intels-atom-did/#comment-12207</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Cane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/03/12/intels-atom-did#comment-12207</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;Isn&#039;t this the same chip you recently showed a benchmark for?  The one that was less powerful than a 900MHz Pentium?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So we can look forward to several years of people cursing these portable devices as I cursed the Finnish Abomination?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Ah, heaven for me!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Isn&#8217;t this the same chip you recently showed a benchmark for?  The one that was less powerful than a 900MHz Pentium?</p>
<p>So we can look forward to several years of people cursing these portable devices as I cursed the Finnish Abomination?</p>
<p>Ah, heaven for me!</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
