Comments on: Mobile Mythbusters: the 1.7GHz Celeron Eee PC http://jkontherun.com/2008/05/16/mobile-mythbust/ Using mobile devices since they weighed 30 lbs. Tue, 17 Nov 2009 04:27:12 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: dbzeag http://jkontherun.com/2008/05/16/mobile-mythbust/#comment-8929 dbzeag Fri, 16 May 2008 11:01:59 +0000 http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/05/16/mobile-mythbust#comment-8929 <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <p>Sorry, as a correction, the 1.73mhz is running on the 533mhz bus, either the SL9KV or SL92F chip.</p> </div>

Sorry, as a correction, the 1.73mhz is running on the 533mhz bus, either the SL9KV or SL92F chip.

]]> By: dbzeag http://jkontherun.com/2008/05/16/mobile-mythbust/#comment-8934 dbzeag Fri, 16 May 2008 10:58:33 +0000 http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/05/16/mobile-mythbust#comment-8934 <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>From the research I was doing, the Eee 701 has the Celeron M SL7QX chip with is running 900mhz (really clocked to 630mhz) running on a 400mhz bus running with a 910 GML northbridge.</p> <p>The rumored chip is a Celeron M 430 running 1.73mhz on a 400mhz bus using either 910GML or 915 chipset.</p> <p>As far as I can tell, if the BIOS is set up for those CPU IDs, it should be plug and play from 900 to 1.7.</p> <p>This is similar to the plug and drop someone did with the Pentium M chip that was swapped into a 701.</p></div>

From the research I was doing, the Eee 701 has the Celeron M SL7QX chip with is running 900mhz (really clocked to 630mhz) running on a 400mhz bus running with a 910 GML northbridge.

The rumored chip is a Celeron M 430 running 1.73mhz on a 400mhz bus using either 910GML or 915 chipset.

As far as I can tell, if the BIOS is set up for those CPU IDs, it should be plug and play from 900 to 1.7.

This is similar to the plug and drop someone did with the Pentium M chip that was swapped into a 701.

]]> By: PJE http://jkontherun.com/2008/05/16/mobile-mythbust/#comment-8939 PJE Fri, 16 May 2008 10:09:14 +0000 http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/05/16/mobile-mythbust#comment-8939 <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>I'd like to see some more battery life data for the EeePC 900 running the Celeron at 900MHz. Some of the data reported at UMPCportal had run times of below 1 hour playing a video (4200 battery).</p> <p>At present I'm leaning towards the MSI Wind.</p></div>

I’d like to see some more battery life data for the EeePC 900 running the Celeron at 900MHz. Some of the data reported at UMPCportal had run times of below 1 hour playing a video (4200 battery).

At present I’m leaning towards the MSI Wind.

]]>