Comments on: First real world Intel Atom benchmarks appear- think Celeron http://jkontherun.com/2008/06/03/first-real-worl/ Using mobile devices since they weighed 30 lbs. Tue, 17 Nov 2009 01:49:05 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: JR http://jkontherun.com/2008/06/03/first-real-worl/#comment-8167 JR Wed, 04 Jun 2008 07:40:07 +0000 http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/06/03/first-real-worl#comment-8167 <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Soooo... Would anyone like to compare the A110 stealy against the atom. From the sounds of it the stealy may consume more power but it actually performs better than the atom. I reckon that intel will dual and quad core these little beasts as it sounds like they will only have any acceptable strength when theres a pack of them.</p> <p>Sounds like my umpc or sub-notebook purchase this xmas will be run by via :)</p></div>

Soooo… Would anyone like to compare the A110 stealy against the atom. From the sounds of it the stealy may consume more power but it actually performs better than the atom. I reckon that intel will dual and quad core these little beasts as it sounds like they will only have any acceptable strength when theres a pack of them.

Sounds like my umpc or sub-notebook purchase this xmas will be run by via :)

]]> By: gorkon http://jkontherun.com/2008/06/03/first-real-worl/#comment-8171 gorkon Tue, 03 Jun 2008 15:42:53 +0000 http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/06/03/first-real-worl#comment-8171 <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <p>Makes me feel justified in not waiting for Atom. My battery life is ok now. If that's all I get, then I will wait a while before ebaying the Eee 702.</p> </div>

Makes me feel justified in not waiting for Atom. My battery life is ok now. If that’s all I get, then I will wait a while before ebaying the Eee 702.

]]> By: Ctitanic http://jkontherun.com/2008/06/03/first-real-worl/#comment-8174 Ctitanic Tue, 03 Jun 2008 09:43:28 +0000 http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/06/03/first-real-worl#comment-8174 <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>So I was right all this time when I was saying that the Atom at 800 MHz was a lot worse than the Intel Celeron used in my old Q1!</p> <p>This test was performed in a Atom at 1.6 GHz double the speed of the one being used so far in the UMPC in the market. ;)</p></div>

So I was right all this time when I was saying that the Atom at 800 MHz was a lot worse than the Intel Celeron used in my old Q1!

This test was performed in a Atom at 1.6 GHz double the speed of the one being used so far in the UMPC in the market. ;)

]]>