<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MSI Wind desktop headed for Asian market</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jkontherun.com/2008/06/30/msi-wind-deskto/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jkontherun.com/2008/06/30/msi-wind-deskto/</link>
	<description>Using mobile devices since they weighed 30 lbs.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 10:54:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: TelKey</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2008/06/30/msi-wind-deskto/#comment-7058</link>
		<dc:creator>TelKey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 18:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/06/30/msi-wind-deskto#comment-7058</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Atom based mini-desktops will use less than 10w at load. they wont be able to push 1080p but that wont matter since most people buying these will probably be using them as file servers (with multiple ext HDD&#039;s attached) or to give to their kids for basic net use. but the dual core Atom mini-desktops will be available this fall.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&quot;powerful&quot; Core2Duo based mini-desktops use at a minimum 40-50w at load, &amp; most of them use considerably more than that.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;so if you dont need power these Atom based mini-desktops are a far far better solution by saving considerable energy &amp; costing much less.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Intel is about to take over the only market VIA has ever owned, all because VIA was to lazy to produce a new chip &amp; is still making people use their old C3. me &amp; other people involved in the silent efficient desktop community have been excited about Atom &amp; the upcoming dual core Atom for quite some time, up until now crappy VIA has been our only option.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Atom based mini-desktops will use less than 10w at load. they wont be able to push 1080p but that wont matter since most people buying these will probably be using them as file servers (with multiple ext HDD&#8217;s attached) or to give to their kids for basic net use. but the dual core Atom mini-desktops will be available this fall.</p>
<p>&#8220;powerful&#8221; Core2Duo based mini-desktops use at a minimum 40-50w at load, &#038; most of them use considerably more than that.</p>
<p>so if you dont need power these Atom based mini-desktops are a far far better solution by saving considerable energy &#038; costing much less.</p>
<p>Intel is about to take over the only market VIA has ever owned, all because VIA was to lazy to produce a new chip &#038; is still making people use their old C3. me &#038; other people involved in the silent efficient desktop community have been excited about Atom &#038; the upcoming dual core Atom for quite some time, up until now crappy VIA has been our only option.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cody B</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2008/06/30/msi-wind-deskto/#comment-7060</link>
		<dc:creator>Cody B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 12:04:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/06/30/msi-wind-deskto#comment-7060</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;Ok so I had a little free time and read the Engadget post.  MSI is saying 720p only.  It’s a step in the right direction. I think it would be perfect for running spyware for young children.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;My little brother and sister love to load up any computer they touch with spyware.  At least spyware will only use 60 watts now. O yeah they browse a few interconnected tubes called the internet as well.  They don’t need powerful machines.  Between the two of them they would be using 60 watts instead of 500 watts.  Not sure what that relates to in dollar amounts, but it must amount to something.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Ok so I had a little free time and read the Engadget post.  MSI is saying 720p only.  It’s a step in the right direction. I think it would be perfect for running spyware for young children.  </p>
<p>My little brother and sister love to load up any computer they touch with spyware.  At least spyware will only use 60 watts now. O yeah they browse a few interconnected tubes called the internet as well.  They don’t need powerful machines.  Between the two of them they would be using 60 watts instead of 500 watts.  Not sure what that relates to in dollar amounts, but it must amount to something.
</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Kendrick</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2008/06/30/msi-wind-deskto/#comment-7062</link>
		<dc:creator>James Kendrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 11:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/06/30/msi-wind-deskto#comment-7062</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Media server makes sense.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Media server makes sense.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cody B</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2008/06/30/msi-wind-deskto/#comment-7064</link>
		<dc:creator>Cody B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 11:46:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/06/30/msi-wind-deskto#comment-7064</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;I would love a media server that is silent and only sips on 40 watts or less.  It must be able to handle 1080p video and have HDMI though.  I doubt this one will, but I can dream.  Until then I will be happy with linux on a PS3.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>I would love a media server that is silent and only sips on 40 watts or less.  It must be able to handle 1080p video and have HDMI though.  I doubt this one will, but I can dream.  Until then I will be happy with linux on a PS3.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TiWD</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2008/06/30/msi-wind-deskto/#comment-7066</link>
		<dc:creator>TiWD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 11:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/06/30/msi-wind-deskto#comment-7066</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;because these desktops are very small (Mac Mini size) &amp; use very little power. which make great use for 24/7 file servers.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>because these desktops are very small (Mac Mini size) &#038; use very little power. which make great use for 24/7 file servers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
