<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Laptop Magazine hands-on with the Dell multi-touch update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jkontherun.com/2008/07/14/laptop-magazine-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jkontherun.com/2008/07/14/laptop-magazine-3/</link>
	<description>Using mobile devices since they weighed 30 lbs.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:10:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SH</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2008/07/14/laptop-magazine-3/#comment-6319</link>
		<dc:creator>SH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 08:56:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/07/14/laptop-magazine-3#comment-6319</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;The latitude XT can be found for bargain prices on various places on the net (I got mine off Ebay fully configured with 3GB Ram + 64gb SSD for much much less than DELL&#039;s qouted price on it&#039;s website)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;PS. The Processor is NOT a Core Solo.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And has anyone managed to find a copy of the firmware upgrade yet ? It&#039;s July 15 over here in UK and the update is nowhere to be found&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>The latitude XT can be found for bargain prices on various places on the net (I got mine off Ebay fully configured with 3GB Ram + 64gb SSD for much much less than DELL&#8217;s qouted price on it&#8217;s website)</p>
<p>PS. The Processor is NOT a Core Solo.</p>
<p>And has anyone managed to find a copy of the firmware upgrade yet ? It&#8217;s July 15 over here in UK and the update is nowhere to be found</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marauderz</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2008/07/14/laptop-magazine-3/#comment-6320</link>
		<dc:creator>Marauderz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 01:56:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/07/14/laptop-magazine-3#comment-6320</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;I was wondering why you were saying that Vista operation with fingers only was clunky. Then I watched the video and noticed that the Touch Cursor (the virtual mouse) isn&#039;t appearing on the Dell, which must mean that they have changed the driver for the screen so that it doesn&#039;t report to Windows that it is a touch screen and thus the Touch Cursor (or was it called the touch pad/control?) doesn&#039;t appear anymore.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;JK, you should be familiar with the it right? Since you&#039;ve used both the 1610 and 1620 with Vista.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I find that very useful cause thanks to the screen bezel and size of elements, the Touch cursor definetly helps make reaching those things better.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>I was wondering why you were saying that Vista operation with fingers only was clunky. Then I watched the video and noticed that the Touch Cursor (the virtual mouse) isn&#8217;t appearing on the Dell, which must mean that they have changed the driver for the screen so that it doesn&#8217;t report to Windows that it is a touch screen and thus the Touch Cursor (or was it called the touch pad/control?) doesn&#8217;t appear anymore.</p>
<p>JK, you should be familiar with the it right? Since you&#8217;ve used both the 1610 and 1620 with Vista.</p>
<p>I find that very useful cause thanks to the screen bezel and size of elements, the Touch cursor definetly helps make reaching those things better.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Gagne</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2008/07/14/laptop-magazine-3/#comment-6321</link>
		<dc:creator>David Gagne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 22:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/07/14/laptop-magazine-3#comment-6321</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ve used an old slatevision and also dabbled on an XT. The touch screen on the XT is nice, but the system is too slow and the interface is not optimized for touch. You notice a lag between motions and response, and also have difficulty with small buttons. Also, as we noticed in this video, trying to scroll can result in misclicks on *gasp* advertising.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s sad that the iPhone/iPod touch, with their much slower processors and lesser ram, can zoom, pan, scroll, etc., with a faster response time, and even maybe more accuracy than a larger system. I attribute the flaw not to Dell, but to MS Vista and it&#039;s lack of touch optimization.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Maybe it&#039;s also Dell&#039;s fault for shipping it with slow processors and with too little memory. I mean really, $2,000+ for a Core Solo and 1GB memory? &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If I wanted that processing power I&#039;d save 1,500 and get a Asus EeePc. Then I could spend $1,000 on a big screen, and then hookup Johnny Lee&#039;s wii-remote-hack on it to get multi-touch. Save money and get more.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>I&#8217;ve used an old slatevision and also dabbled on an XT. The touch screen on the XT is nice, but the system is too slow and the interface is not optimized for touch. You notice a lag between motions and response, and also have difficulty with small buttons. Also, as we noticed in this video, trying to scroll can result in misclicks on *gasp* advertising.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s sad that the iPhone/iPod touch, with their much slower processors and lesser ram, can zoom, pan, scroll, etc., with a faster response time, and even maybe more accuracy than a larger system. I attribute the flaw not to Dell, but to MS Vista and it&#8217;s lack of touch optimization.</p>
<p>Maybe it&#8217;s also Dell&#8217;s fault for shipping it with slow processors and with too little memory. I mean really, $2,000+ for a Core Solo and 1GB memory? </p>
<p>If I wanted that processing power I&#8217;d save 1,500 and get a Asus EeePc. Then I could spend $1,000 on a big screen, and then hookup Johnny Lee&#8217;s wii-remote-hack on it to get multi-touch. Save money and get more.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Feralboy</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2008/07/14/laptop-magazine-3/#comment-6322</link>
		<dc:creator>Feralboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 20:10:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/07/14/laptop-magazine-3#comment-6322</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;I agree with stablet -- the &quot;clunkiness&quot; definitely seems attributable to the fact that 1) it was in laptop mode, and 2) she was standing to the side so that she didn&#039;t obscure the screen. Not sure how those two conditions could result in anything but &quot;clunkiness&quot;. I&#039;m eager to hear how people fare as this looks like a pretty decent addition to the Dell.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>I agree with stablet &#8212; the &#8220;clunkiness&#8221; definitely seems attributable to the fact that 1) it was in laptop mode, and 2) she was standing to the side so that she didn&#8217;t obscure the screen. Not sure how those two conditions could result in anything but &#8220;clunkiness&#8221;. I&#8217;m eager to hear how people fare as this looks like a pretty decent addition to the Dell.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sbtablet</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2008/07/14/laptop-magazine-3/#comment-6323</link>
		<dc:creator>sbtablet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 20:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/07/14/laptop-magazine-3#comment-6323</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;I do agree that she was having a little trouble with stray windows popping up, etc. I attribute that more to the fact that she had it in laptop mode, which is great for the camera, but more awkward and inaccurate for touch, and that she didn&#039;t seem all that familiar with the new gestures and using the tablet, period. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Yeah, I agree that Vista could be more touch friendly, too. Some of my friends with bigger hands are looking forward to zooming a window just to make small icons, etc. easier to touch. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>I do agree that she was having a little trouble with stray windows popping up, etc. I attribute that more to the fact that she had it in laptop mode, which is great for the camera, but more awkward and inaccurate for touch, and that she didn&#8217;t seem all that familiar with the new gestures and using the tablet, period. </p>
<p>
Yeah, I agree that Vista could be more touch friendly, too. Some of my friends with bigger hands are looking forward to zooming a window just to make small icons, etc. easier to touch. 
</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Kendrick</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2008/07/14/laptop-magazine-3/#comment-6325</link>
		<dc:creator>James Kendrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 19:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/07/14/laptop-magazine-3#comment-6325</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;sbtablet, I didn&#039;t call the Dell clunky.  I said the interface looked a bit clunky based on the reviewer&#039;s consistent difficulty manipulating things on the screen and closing windows.  That&#039;s what appears clunky to me.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>sbtablet, I didn&#8217;t call the Dell clunky.  I said the interface looked a bit clunky based on the reviewer&#8217;s consistent difficulty manipulating things on the screen and closing windows.  That&#8217;s what appears clunky to me.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sbtablet</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2008/07/14/laptop-magazine-3/#comment-6327</link>
		<dc:creator>sbtablet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 19:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/07/14/laptop-magazine-3#comment-6327</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;James--&lt;br /&gt;
Have you ever used a Dell XT? The last thing I would call it is clunky. It is the best touch interface there is. Granted, my hands are small, but I have no trouble doing things like picking a command out of a dropdown list or hitting the x to close a program. It&#039;s very slick. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I was surprised that the reviewer was using two hands to zoom, rather than the pinch gesture. I think this may be what made it look &quot;clunky&quot; to you. This would be natural if you had the computer on a table, but I would definitely want to use the one hand pinch if I were holding it in slate mode.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I can&#039;t wait to try out the multi-touch functions. But please don&#039;t call the Dell clunky. At least not until you&#039;ve actually used one. It&#039;s very different from any other touch screen tablet in its feel. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>James&#8211;<br />
Have you ever used a Dell XT? The last thing I would call it is clunky. It is the best touch interface there is. Granted, my hands are small, but I have no trouble doing things like picking a command out of a dropdown list or hitting the x to close a program. It&#8217;s very slick. </p>
<p>I was surprised that the reviewer was using two hands to zoom, rather than the pinch gesture. I think this may be what made it look &#8220;clunky&#8221; to you. This would be natural if you had the computer on a table, but I would definitely want to use the one hand pinch if I were holding it in slate mode.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t wait to try out the multi-touch functions. But please don&#8217;t call the Dell clunky. At least not until you&#8217;ve actually used one. It&#8217;s very different from any other touch screen tablet in its feel. </p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
