<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The speed of mobility</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jkontherun.com/2008/07/15/the-speed-of-mo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jkontherun.com/2008/07/15/the-speed-of-mo/</link>
	<description>Using mobile devices since they weighed 30 lbs.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 06:03:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: nomo</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2008/07/15/the-speed-of-mo/#comment-6299</link>
		<dc:creator>nomo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 16:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/07/15/the-speed-of-mo#comment-6299</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think the majority of notebook models will feature Centrino 2. The 25W processor was released this week; small form factor, 5.5+ watt versions are expected in September.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Atom&#039;s niche seems to be maximizing battery life on handheld devices. The chip consumes 0.6-2.5 watts and is only 13mm x 14mm in size. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Netbook makers may also choose the Atom because of it&#039;s price; hard to put a $200-$300 Centrino 2 processor in a computer selling for $300-$500.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>I think the majority of notebook models will feature Centrino 2. The 25W processor was released this week; small form factor, 5.5+ watt versions are expected in September.</p>
<p>Atom&#8217;s niche seems to be maximizing battery life on handheld devices. The chip consumes 0.6-2.5 watts and is only 13mm x 14mm in size. </p>
<p>Netbook makers may also choose the Atom because of it&#8217;s price; hard to put a $200-$300 Centrino 2 processor in a computer selling for $300-$500.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Kendrick</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2008/07/15/the-speed-of-mo/#comment-6301</link>
		<dc:creator>James Kendrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 14:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/07/15/the-speed-of-mo#comment-6301</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;I compared the Centrino 2 to Atom because OEMs are putting them in Windows boxes and people seem to think that&#039;s a good thing.  That&#039;s why I think the Centrino 2 makes more sense in that scenario.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>I compared the Centrino 2 to Atom because OEMs are putting them in Windows boxes and people seem to think that&#8217;s a good thing.  That&#8217;s why I think the Centrino 2 makes more sense in that scenario.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zunq</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2008/07/15/the-speed-of-mo/#comment-6304</link>
		<dc:creator>zunq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 14:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/07/15/the-speed-of-mo#comment-6304</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;The Atom shouldn&#039;t be compared to the Centrino 2.  People expected way too much from the Atom when they pay over $500 for a Windows netbook when it is intended to run Linux. Dell&#039;s $299 Linux netbook will be the game changer for the Atom. I think the Atom works a whole lot better with resource efficient Linux where a Centrino 2 would be overkill.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>The Atom shouldn&#8217;t be compared to the Centrino 2.  People expected way too much from the Atom when they pay over $500 for a Windows netbook when it is intended to run Linux. Dell&#8217;s $299 Linux netbook will be the game changer for the Atom. I think the Atom works a whole lot better with resource efficient Linux where a Centrino 2 would be overkill.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
