<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OQO to get the Atom</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jkontherun.com/2008/08/19/oqo-to-get-the/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jkontherun.com/2008/08/19/oqo-to-get-the/</link>
	<description>Using mobile devices since they weighed 30 lbs.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 03:11:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: JC</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2008/08/19/oqo-to-get-the/#comment-4225</link>
		<dc:creator>JC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 06:05:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/08/20/oqo-to-get-the#comment-4225</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;Dennis Moore, OQO&#039;s CEO stressed in a long post at OQOTalk that this is a &quot;technology showcase, not an impending product announcement.&quot; It&#039;s kind of funny then that everyone is treating it as if it were an impending product announcement.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;His post:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.oqotalk.com/index.php/topic,2922.msg22889.html#msg22889&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.oqotalk.com/index.php/topic,2922.msg22889.html#msg22889&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It may be that they&#039;ll eventually announce an Atom-based product. However, I see a lot of jumping to conclusions and counting of unhatched chickens. Dennis Moore called it a prototype. If they should choose to develop this into a full-fledged product, there&#039;s nothing to stop them from making other changes in the process. Unless someone has gotten a statement from an OQO official, I don&#039;t think we can just assume that they will release a device which is the current Model 02 except with an Intel Atom.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This device actually raises more questions about OQO&#039;s future plans than it answers.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Dennis Moore, OQO&#8217;s CEO stressed in a long post at OQOTalk that this is a &#8220;technology showcase, not an impending product announcement.&#8221; It&#8217;s kind of funny then that everyone is treating it as if it were an impending product announcement.</p>
<p>His post:<br />
<a href="http://www.oqotalk.com/index.php/topic,2922.msg22889.html#msg22889" rel="nofollow">http://www.oqotalk.com/index.php/topic,2922.msg22889.html#msg22889</a></p>
<p>It may be that they&#8217;ll eventually announce an Atom-based product. However, I see a lot of jumping to conclusions and counting of unhatched chickens. Dennis Moore called it a prototype. If they should choose to develop this into a full-fledged product, there&#8217;s nothing to stop them from making other changes in the process. Unless someone has gotten a statement from an OQO official, I don&#8217;t think we can just assume that they will release a device which is the current Model 02 except with an Intel Atom.</p>
<p>This device actually raises more questions about OQO&#8217;s future plans than it answers.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John in Norway</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2008/08/19/oqo-to-get-the/#comment-4226</link>
		<dc:creator>John in Norway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 04:31:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/08/20/oqo-to-get-the#comment-4226</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;It may be long in the tooth but it&#039;s still the best device of its kind out there and this can only make it better.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Since I&#039;ve purchased the ideal 2 devices (for me) I study all the new ones coming out and none of them make my credit card cringe in fear (which is fortunate because real life is sucking up all my money). :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>It may be long in the tooth but it&#8217;s still the best device of its kind out there and this can only make it better.</p>
<p>Since I&#8217;ve purchased the ideal 2 devices (for me) I study all the new ones coming out and none of them make my credit card cringe in fear (which is fortunate because real life is sucking up all my money). <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luscious</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2008/08/19/oqo-to-get-the/#comment-4228</link>
		<dc:creator>Luscious</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 23:28:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/08/20/oqo-to-get-the#comment-4228</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;I seriously doubt the price will change, considering the starting price for the base model is $1299. OQO has always been expensive. You cannot pitch that against a $499 mininote, especially when the two are aimed at different users and have a different feature set.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>I seriously doubt the price will change, considering the starting price for the base model is $1299. OQO has always been expensive. You cannot pitch that against a $499 mininote, especially when the two are aimed at different users and have a different feature set.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Turboi</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2008/08/19/oqo-to-get-the/#comment-4230</link>
		<dc:creator>Turboi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 22:56:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/08/20/oqo-to-get-the#comment-4230</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;my guess is it wont change the pricing 1 bit, OQO is the type of company that will sell a product as much as the market will allow for as long as possible ... all other factors come second.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>my guess is it wont change the pricing 1 bit, OQO is the type of company that will sell a product as much as the market will allow for as long as possible &#8230; all other factors come second.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ninjakamster</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2008/08/19/oqo-to-get-the/#comment-4232</link>
		<dc:creator>Ninjakamster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 21:56:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/08/20/oqo-to-get-the#comment-4232</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;Oh thank goodness, the QQQ is one of my favorite UMPCs and the cruddy Via C7 processor killed it for me.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Now to put the processor in the HP MiniNote also a great computer paired with the horrid C7 processor!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Oh thank goodness, the QQQ is one of my favorite UMPCs and the cruddy Via C7 processor killed it for me.</p>
<p>Now to put the processor in the HP MiniNote also a great computer paired with the horrid C7 processor!</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
