<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The TechCrunch Tablet is now a prototype</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jkontherun.com/2008/08/31/the-techcrunch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jkontherun.com/2008/08/31/the-techcrunch/</link>
	<description>Using mobile devices since they weighed 30 lbs.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 01:49:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brian M</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2008/08/31/the-techcrunch/#comment-3619</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 08:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/08/31/the-techcrunch#comment-3619</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;The terminal as a low cost solution is alive and well.&lt;br /&gt;
The Redfly is dropping it&#039;s price (and will likely continue to do so until it finds a sweet spot or folds) and now this.&lt;br /&gt;
Carry and marry this device to any server of any platform via WiFi/Bluetooth/USB and you&#039;re all set.&lt;br /&gt;
For everyone who wants to power these types of devices up, a very real price point exists that is coupled with processing components.&lt;br /&gt;
Continuing to unrealistically call for more processing at the cost of a terminal reminds me that many totally discount touch cost.&lt;br /&gt;
Even if the entire process is totally automated, at some point, the people who touch the device should make a reasonable return.&lt;br /&gt;
What would that return be for you?  Now put that onto the people doing the touching.&lt;br /&gt;
What does that cost look like?&lt;br /&gt;
Would you touch the device for what the people currently doing so are doing it for?&lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>The terminal as a low cost solution is alive and well.<br />
The Redfly is dropping it&#8217;s price (and will likely continue to do so until it finds a sweet spot or folds) and now this.<br />
Carry and marry this device to any server of any platform via WiFi/Bluetooth/USB and you&#8217;re all set.<br />
For everyone who wants to power these types of devices up, a very real price point exists that is coupled with processing components.<br />
Continuing to unrealistically call for more processing at the cost of a terminal reminds me that many totally discount touch cost.<br />
Even if the entire process is totally automated, at some point, the people who touch the device should make a reasonable return.<br />
What would that return be for you?  Now put that onto the people doing the touching.<br />
What does that cost look like?<br />
Would you touch the device for what the people currently doing so are doing it for?
  </p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mitchell Oke</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2008/08/31/the-techcrunch/#comment-3621</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitchell Oke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 17:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/08/31/the-techcrunch#comment-3621</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Well we&#039;ve got a device called the Wind, might as well have one called the Cloud.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Well we&#8217;ve got a device called the Wind, might as well have one called the Cloud.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zunq</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2008/08/31/the-techcrunch/#comment-3624</link>
		<dc:creator>zunq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 15:55:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/08/31/the-techcrunch#comment-3624</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;Wouldn&#039;t this thing be obsolete since the $200 Ipod Touch is purportedly coming soon? I mean the iPhone/iPod Touch is more portable yet not all that compromising and it can do a lot more than web browsing.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I think a better idea would be to make a linux slate for $3-400. It could run on an atom processor and do a lot more than web browsing.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Wouldn&#8217;t this thing be obsolete since the $200 Ipod Touch is purportedly coming soon? I mean the iPhone/iPod Touch is more portable yet not all that compromising and it can do a lot more than web browsing.</p>
<p>I think a better idea would be to make a linux slate for $3-400. It could run on an atom processor and do a lot more than web browsing.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2008/08/31/the-techcrunch/#comment-3626</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 14:49:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/08/31/the-techcrunch#comment-3626</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;Yeah, this &quot;no OS&quot; feature is really misleading.  Is the browser directly writing the pixels into the memory buffer of the graphics chip?  Is it writing any information it needs to store (think cookies, cached pages, browser extensions) directly as bits into the flash memory, without the help of a file system?  Is the browser going to implement memory management?  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I guess what they mean is that they don&#039;t expose the operating system to the user through CLIs, file browsers, ...  And they are presumably minimizing the operating system for fast loading, cost, and reliability purposes.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Yeah, this &#8220;no OS&#8221; feature is really misleading.  Is the browser directly writing the pixels into the memory buffer of the graphics chip?  Is it writing any information it needs to store (think cookies, cached pages, browser extensions) directly as bits into the flash memory, without the help of a file system?  Is the browser going to implement memory management?  </p>
<p>I guess what they mean is that they don&#8217;t expose the operating system to the user through CLIs, file browsers, &#8230;  And they are presumably minimizing the operating system for fast loading, cost, and reliability purposes.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mr-crash</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2008/08/31/the-techcrunch/#comment-3629</link>
		<dc:creator>mr-crash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 11:25:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/08/31/the-techcrunch#comment-3629</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;I&#039;d buy this... For $200 - fantastic pricing.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Hopefully such a device would introduce lots more people to how remarkable tablet based computing can be.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I wonder what internal specs it will have. Don&#039;t care so much about processor - but i&#039;m interested in space and sockets. SD + USB and something to run an external display would be nice.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m pretty excited about this :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>I&#8217;d buy this&#8230; For $200 &#8211; fantastic pricing.</p>
<p>Hopefully such a device would introduce lots more people to how remarkable tablet based computing can be.</p>
<p>I wonder what internal specs it will have. Don&#8217;t care so much about processor &#8211; but i&#8217;m interested in space and sockets. SD + USB and something to run an external display would be nice.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m pretty excited about this <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Zatz</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2008/08/31/the-techcrunch/#comment-3631</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Zatz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 11:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/08/31/the-techcrunch#comment-3631</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;If they can keep the price down and come up with an effective way to &quot;type&quot;, a 10-12&quot; screen is much more readable than say the screen of a Nokia N800/N810. I assume no OS means Linux ;) we need something to produce and manage the WiFi driver for example.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>If they can keep the price down and come up with an effective way to &#8220;type&#8221;, a 10-12&#8243; screen is much more readable than say the screen of a Nokia N800/N810. I assume no OS means Linux <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  we need something to produce and manage the WiFi driver for example.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
