<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fujitsu-Siemens Stylistic ST6012: long live the slate PC!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jkontherun.com/2008/09/29/fujitsu-siemens/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jkontherun.com/2008/09/29/fujitsu-siemens/</link>
	<description>Using mobile devices since they weighed 30 lbs.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:08:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: nomo</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2008/09/29/fujitsu-siemens/#comment-2240</link>
		<dc:creator>nomo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 03:46:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/09/29/fujitsu-siemens#comment-2240</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;The ST6012 is undergoing testing at the FCC:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.electronista.com/articles/08/10/09/fujitsu.tablet.pc.spotted/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.electronista.com/articles/08/10/09/fujitsu.tablet.pc.spotted/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>The ST6012 is undergoing testing at the FCC:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.electronista.com/articles/08/10/09/fujitsu.tablet.pc.spotted/" rel="nofollow">http://www.electronista.com/articles/08/10/09/fujitsu.tablet.pc.spotted/</a></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bristolview</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2008/09/29/fujitsu-siemens/#comment-2242</link>
		<dc:creator>Bristolview</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 07:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/09/29/fujitsu-siemens#comment-2242</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;About 3 years ago, I lost the use of my right hand to severe arthritis like symptoms.  They&#039;re not arthritis, but the fingers are generally unusable and as such, I can no longer touch type.  I can still hold a pen though.  Since then, I&#039;ve been using a Tablet for near 100% of my work, all emails, all documentation, all development.  I was forced to go this route, so I&#039;ve had to stick with it.  Many others run back to their familiar keyboard within a few hours.  I&#039;m glad I sticked with it.  It is a really impressive experience, and very well done.  Not perfect, but well... Windows 7 improves on it a bit more, you&#039;ll love it.  Anyway, I have a X61 Tablet, and it works fine.  I&#039;m looking at this new Fujitsu as a replacement, so I can ditch the keyboard and go with a cleaner, simpler and less mechanical (subject to breakage) slate design.  The Motion LE1700 looks good, but this is looking very nice.  Anyway, don&#039;t just assume that a slate can only review documents, I&#039;m a Technical Editor on industry technical specifications, and it&#039;s all done by slate.  No problem at all.  (this entered by slate too).  Reviewing docs, sure.  Creating them, absolutely!  I am not at all limited by a slate.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>About 3 years ago, I lost the use of my right hand to severe arthritis like symptoms.  They&#8217;re not arthritis, but the fingers are generally unusable and as such, I can no longer touch type.  I can still hold a pen though.  Since then, I&#8217;ve been using a Tablet for near 100% of my work, all emails, all documentation, all development.  I was forced to go this route, so I&#8217;ve had to stick with it.  Many others run back to their familiar keyboard within a few hours.  I&#8217;m glad I sticked with it.  It is a really impressive experience, and very well done.  Not perfect, but well&#8230; Windows 7 improves on it a bit more, you&#8217;ll love it.  Anyway, I have a X61 Tablet, and it works fine.  I&#8217;m looking at this new Fujitsu as a replacement, so I can ditch the keyboard and go with a cleaner, simpler and less mechanical (subject to breakage) slate design.  The Motion LE1700 looks good, but this is looking very nice.  Anyway, don&#8217;t just assume that a slate can only review documents, I&#8217;m a Technical Editor on industry technical specifications, and it&#8217;s all done by slate.  No problem at all.  (this entered by slate too).  Reviewing docs, sure.  Creating them, absolutely!  I am not at all limited by a slate.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2008/09/29/fujitsu-siemens/#comment-2243</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 15:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/09/29/fujitsu-siemens#comment-2243</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Anyone hear if they plan the 10 inch version of the 6100 series like with other series.  This looks great if it would be smaller and lighter. I need a great paper grading, note taking, take everywhere machine. Right now  P1610 serves that function for me.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Anyone hear if they plan the 10 inch version of the 6100 series like with other series.  This looks great if it would be smaller and lighter. I need a great paper grading, note taking, take everywhere machine. Right now  P1610 serves that function for me.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jose R. Ortiz</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2008/09/29/fujitsu-siemens/#comment-2244</link>
		<dc:creator>Jose R. Ortiz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 22:24:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/09/29/fujitsu-siemens#comment-2244</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;I too remember watching Kevin&#039;s review of the 5112 after which I promptly purchased one. I ended up sticking with the Motion 1600LE but have been planning to get the 5112 again. I&#039;m glad to see a new slate coming out but I&#039;m not very impressed by the design. I wonder if this semi-rugged model will be targeted to field professionals with a more consumer-centric design to follow. Keeping my fingers crossed.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;BTW, Tobu: Take a look at Tablet Kiosk and Motion Computing since I think their lines would meet the requirements that you&#039;ve listed.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>I too remember watching Kevin&#8217;s review of the 5112 after which I promptly purchased one. I ended up sticking with the Motion 1600LE but have been planning to get the 5112 again. I&#8217;m glad to see a new slate coming out but I&#8217;m not very impressed by the design. I wonder if this semi-rugged model will be targeted to field professionals with a more consumer-centric design to follow. Keeping my fingers crossed.</p>
<p>BTW, Tobu: Take a look at Tablet Kiosk and Motion Computing since I think their lines would meet the requirements that you&#8217;ve listed.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin C. Tofel</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2008/09/29/fujitsu-siemens/#comment-2245</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin C. Tofel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 22:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/09/29/fujitsu-siemens#comment-2245</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Mike, this new model does have a webcam on the back of the device. F-S calls it a conference cam. &lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Mike, this new model does have a webcam on the back of the device. F-S calls it a conference cam. </p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Klein</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2008/09/29/fujitsu-siemens/#comment-2246</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Klein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 21:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/09/29/fujitsu-siemens#comment-2246</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think it&#039;s missing a 1.3Mp web camera.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I own the ST5111 and love it (shoulda gotten the ST5112 though).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;After a year only thing I miss is integrated webcam and fingerprint reader and 2nd microphone (last 2 on 5112 but not 5111).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>I think it&#8217;s missing a 1.3Mp web camera.</p>
<p>I own the ST5111 and love it (shoulda gotten the ST5112 though).</p>
<p>After a year only thing I miss is integrated webcam and fingerprint reader and 2nd microphone (last 2 on 5112 but not 5111).</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: borax99 (Alain C.)</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2008/09/29/fujitsu-siemens/#comment-2247</link>
		<dc:creator>borax99 (Alain C.)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 16:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/09/29/fujitsu-siemens#comment-2247</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;I have a Fuji 5020D. It&#039;s older and runs XP tablet, but I must say that it is so superbly balanced that it is actually *more* comfortable to use than the much lighter P1610.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This new slate looks very very nice, but it will be mucho dinero. To spec out the 5112 decently, you end up at near-4K !!!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>I have a Fuji 5020D. It&#8217;s older and runs XP tablet, but I must say that it is so superbly balanced that it is actually *more* comfortable to use than the much lighter P1610.</p>
<p>This new slate looks very very nice, but it will be mucho dinero. To spec out the 5112 decently, you end up at near-4K !!!</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin C. Tofel</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2008/09/29/fujitsu-siemens/#comment-2248</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin C. Tofel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 14:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/09/29/fujitsu-siemens#comment-2248</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Tobu, I&#039;m personally spoiled by lighter devices when I think about it. My last several purchases of UMPCs and netbooks in the past two years have all weighed less than three pounds, so a 3.52-pound slate isn&#039;t something I&#039;d be looking for. However, I&#039;m sure many folks would be just fine with a slate Tablet PC with this weight. To just review or use docs (f those are your only needs), I have to wonder if you&#039;re in the target audience for the iRex 1000 series Digital Reader. It wouldn&#039;t provide as much functionality as the Stylistic slates of course, but would cost much less and weighs 1.2-pounds. See: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jkontherun.com/2008/09/irex-digital-re.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.jkontherun.com/2008/09/irex-digital-re.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Tobu, I&#8217;m personally spoiled by lighter devices when I think about it. My last several purchases of UMPCs and netbooks in the past two years have all weighed less than three pounds, so a 3.52-pound slate isn&#8217;t something I&#8217;d be looking for. However, I&#8217;m sure many folks would be just fine with a slate Tablet PC with this weight. To just review or use docs (f those are your only needs), I have to wonder if you&#8217;re in the target audience for the iRex 1000 series Digital Reader. It wouldn&#8217;t provide as much functionality as the Stylistic slates of course, but would cost much less and weighs 1.2-pounds. See: <a href="http://www.jkontherun.com/2008/09/irex-digital-re.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.jkontherun.com/2008/09/irex-digital-re.html</a></p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TateJ</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2008/09/29/fujitsu-siemens/#comment-2249</link>
		<dc:creator>TateJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 14:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/09/29/fujitsu-siemens#comment-2249</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Oh Yeah!!!!!&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Oh Yeah!!!!!</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tobu</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2008/09/29/fujitsu-siemens/#comment-2250</link>
		<dc:creator>Tobu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 14:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/09/29/fujitsu-siemens#comment-2250</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;Kevin I remember watching with fascination your video review of its predecessor (18 months ago?) which was my first insight into tablets. Now after a year with a X61T, I think a slate would be a great addition to the line up. Yes, addition. I&#039;d like an additional device to use along side my tablet laptop. One for just reviewing or using documents. Perhaps a full size ereader could take that place at some point in the future!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So my main issue is the weight of this new tablet - any thoughts Kevin?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Kevin I remember watching with fascination your video review of its predecessor (18 months ago?) which was my first insight into tablets. Now after a year with a X61T, I think a slate would be a great addition to the line up. Yes, addition. I&#8217;d like an additional device to use along side my tablet laptop. One for just reviewing or using documents. Perhaps a full size ereader could take that place at some point in the future!</p>
<p>So my main issue is the weight of this new tablet &#8211; any thoughts Kevin?</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
