<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The State of Notebooks in 2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jkontherun.com/2008/10/13/notebooks-in-20/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jkontherun.com/2008/10/13/notebooks-in-20/</link>
	<description>Using mobile devices since they weighed 30 lbs.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:46:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2008/10/13/notebooks-in-20/#comment-1538</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 04:38:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/10/13/notebooks-in-20#comment-1538</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think netbooks are pretty much a toy for the time being. Or, while people are going from desktop to laptop, geeks who would&#039;ve had a desktop and a laptop now own a laptop and a netbook.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The problem with netbooks as low cost computers is that they&#039;re tiny, have small screens and small keyboards, and no optical drives. My parents are comfortable on a desktop, do ok on a laptop, but have trouble using my 13&quot; laptop because the screen is smaller. Add to that the fact that while their MSRP is lower, the final price is about the same as the &quot;weekly special&quot; laptop. I got my 15.4&quot; Gateway for $370 back in 2006 and my Acer for $330 in 2007. Incidentally, my Mini-Note also cost me $340 but I also have a relatively powerful desktop which I&#039;m going to use in tandem with the ultraportable.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The great thing about netbooks for geeks like me who can&#039;t afford Fujitsu&#039;s latest creation is that they&#039;re about the same size, only slightly slower and much cheaper.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>I think netbooks are pretty much a toy for the time being. Or, while people are going from desktop to laptop, geeks who would&#8217;ve had a desktop and a laptop now own a laptop and a netbook.</p>
<p>The problem with netbooks as low cost computers is that they&#8217;re tiny, have small screens and small keyboards, and no optical drives. My parents are comfortable on a desktop, do ok on a laptop, but have trouble using my 13&#8243; laptop because the screen is smaller. Add to that the fact that while their MSRP is lower, the final price is about the same as the &#8220;weekly special&#8221; laptop. I got my 15.4&#8243; Gateway for $370 back in 2006 and my Acer for $330 in 2007. Incidentally, my Mini-Note also cost me $340 but I also have a relatively powerful desktop which I&#8217;m going to use in tandem with the ultraportable.</p>
<p>The great thing about netbooks for geeks like me who can&#8217;t afford Fujitsu&#8217;s latest creation is that they&#8217;re about the same size, only slightly slower and much cheaper.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sextoy</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2008/10/13/notebooks-in-20/#comment-1539</link>
		<dc:creator>sextoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 03:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/10/13/notebooks-in-20#comment-1539</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;sex toy&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;adult toy&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>sex toy</p>
<p>adult toy
</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rbtone</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2008/10/13/notebooks-in-20/#comment-1540</link>
		<dc:creator>rbtone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 01:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/10/13/notebooks-in-20#comment-1540</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;a free power leveling of 12 hours or 100 gold bonus from gmlvl.com your any new order in Oct.No bots ! no delay ! fast and safe powerleveling and gold delivery.&lt;br /&gt;
New special 1-60 power leveling, price $56.99 with lvl40 mount&lt;br /&gt;
Simple  60-70 powerleveling, price $58.99,with 2000 gold and 375 first aids~~~~~&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>a free power leveling of 12 hours or 100 gold bonus from gmlvl.com your any new order in Oct.No bots ! no delay ! fast and safe powerleveling and gold delivery.<br />
New special 1-60 power leveling, price $56.99 with lvl40 mount<br />
Simple  60-70 powerleveling, price $58.99,with 2000 gold and 375 first aids~~~~~</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott_H</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2008/10/13/notebooks-in-20/#comment-1541</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott_H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 01:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/10/13/notebooks-in-20#comment-1541</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;OK. So, different strokes... I can see that. Besides my preference for performance over size, the ravages of age certainly dictate what I choose to work with -- as I&#039;m sure anyone over 40 can attest to. Higher resolution (or even yesterday&#039;s &quot;standard&quot; resolution) on a smaller screen makes for a miserable experience for those of us with less than 20/20 vision.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>OK. So, different strokes&#8230; I can see that. Besides my preference for performance over size, the ravages of age certainly dictate what I choose to work with &#8212; as I&#8217;m sure anyone over 40 can attest to. Higher resolution (or even yesterday&#8217;s &#8220;standard&#8221; resolution) on a smaller screen makes for a miserable experience for those of us with less than 20/20 vision.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ben</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2008/10/13/notebooks-in-20/#comment-1543</link>
		<dc:creator>ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 01:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/10/13/notebooks-in-20#comment-1543</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ve been using the ASUS 1000H as my sole notebook for about the last week or so.  It&#039;s working great and it feels awesome in my hand when I pick it up.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;@Scott&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m not sure if you measured properly. Most 14&quot; notebooks weigh at least 5lbs (most around 5.5lbs) and most 13&quot; notebooks weigh about 4.5 lbs.  My &quot;main&quot; notebook is a 14&quot;-er and I can notice a big difference between it and my relatively &quot;fat&quot; netbook (~3.2lbs).  I also notice a massive difference in the battery life.  I can use my netbook all morning without a outlet while my notebook could only make it through 2/3 of a flight.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>I&#8217;ve been using the ASUS 1000H as my sole notebook for about the last week or so.  It&#8217;s working great and it feels awesome in my hand when I pick it up.</p>
<p>@Scott</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure if you measured properly. Most 14&#8243; notebooks weigh at least 5lbs (most around 5.5lbs) and most 13&#8243; notebooks weigh about 4.5 lbs.  My &#8220;main&#8221; notebook is a 14&#8243;-er and I can notice a big difference between it and my relatively &#8220;fat&#8221; netbook (~3.2lbs).  I also notice a massive difference in the battery life.  I can use my netbook all morning without a outlet while my notebook could only make it through 2/3 of a flight.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: InstantOn</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2008/10/13/notebooks-in-20/#comment-1545</link>
		<dc:creator>InstantOn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 19:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/10/13/notebooks-in-20#comment-1545</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;In reply to Scott, everyone is different but the big things with a netbook is size and weight. My wife uses hers on the train in her job as a writer/editor. She has a Sony Vaio laptop SZ about the size of your Gateway but leaves that at home as commuting with her Acer Aspire One is a much better experience especially when it comes to carrying it walking to the train and the office. The other thing I like is Windows XP. Great to be able to remain with a old acquaintance. I was going to say old friend but that might be going a bit far!&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>In reply to Scott, everyone is different but the big things with a netbook is size and weight. My wife uses hers on the train in her job as a writer/editor. She has a Sony Vaio laptop SZ about the size of your Gateway but leaves that at home as commuting with her Acer Aspire One is a much better experience especially when it comes to carrying it walking to the train and the office. The other thing I like is Windows XP. Great to be able to remain with a old acquaintance. I was going to say old friend but that might be going a bit far!</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2008/10/13/notebooks-in-20/#comment-1547</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 17:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/10/13/notebooks-in-20#comment-1547</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;I guess where I was going with the above is that, to me, it seems the netbooks don&#039;t offer much more in the way of performance or convenience, and in fact may offer less relative to what I currently have. And in many cases, the netbooks aren&#039;t any cheaper than what I have.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So, other than the novelty factor, I&#039;m not sure I see the point in having a netbook as opposed to a full-sized laptop. What am I missing?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>I guess where I was going with the above is that, to me, it seems the netbooks don&#8217;t offer much more in the way of performance or convenience, and in fact may offer less relative to what I currently have. And in many cases, the netbooks aren&#8217;t any cheaper than what I have.</p>
<p>So, other than the novelty factor, I&#8217;m not sure I see the point in having a netbook as opposed to a full-sized laptop. What am I missing?</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2008/10/13/notebooks-in-20/#comment-1549</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 16:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/10/13/notebooks-in-20#comment-1549</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;I wonder if the netbooks will ever fully replace the &quot;typical&quot; low cost laptops. On a lark, I just measured my mid-2007 vintage Gateway retail laptop (I believe I got it at Office Depot, not sure) and found it&#039;s just a little over 1 inch thick -- it actually looks and feels quite thin even though it wasn&#039;t marketed as a thin PC. It weighs about 4 lbs. Not as light as 3 lbs or less, but not bad. It has a 2.2 Mhz CPU, 120 GB HDD, 2 GB RAM, 14.1 in screen and the standard battery runs for about 3 hours with wifi on. It runs Vista SP1 like a champ (Vista pre-SP1 definitely sucked, though).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m not sure where I&#039;m going with all of this, but the kicker is that, at the time, I paid around $449 (after rebate; I believe the original retail price was $599). I wonder how the comparably priced netbooks would stack up?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>I wonder if the netbooks will ever fully replace the &#8220;typical&#8221; low cost laptops. On a lark, I just measured my mid-2007 vintage Gateway retail laptop (I believe I got it at Office Depot, not sure) and found it&#8217;s just a little over 1 inch thick &#8212; it actually looks and feels quite thin even though it wasn&#8217;t marketed as a thin PC. It weighs about 4 lbs. Not as light as 3 lbs or less, but not bad. It has a 2.2 Mhz CPU, 120 GB HDD, 2 GB RAM, 14.1 in screen and the standard battery runs for about 3 hours with wifi on. It runs Vista SP1 like a champ (Vista pre-SP1 definitely sucked, though).</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure where I&#8217;m going with all of this, but the kicker is that, at the time, I paid around $449 (after rebate; I believe the original retail price was $599). I wonder how the comparably priced netbooks would stack up?</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
