<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AdMob reveals that iPhone is popular for browsing. Really!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jkontherun.com/2008/11/19/admob-reveals-t/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jkontherun.com/2008/11/19/admob-reveals-t/</link>
	<description>Using mobile devices since they weighed 30 lbs.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 03:49:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Baz</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2008/11/19/admob-reveals-t/#comment-42680</link>
		<dc:creator>Baz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 08:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/11/19/admob-reveals-t#comment-42680</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;The iPhone might be popular for browsing and other devices / OSs more popular elsewhere - but it (and similar) smartphones that rely almost entirely on wireless data to provide their core services are limited by the cost of that data.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As reported here -&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thestar.com/article/540077&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.thestar.com/article/540077&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;- Canadians like their smartphones but not the cost of the cost of the data plans, so many features are not being employed. Wi-fi capable phones are keeping the market alive in the home consumer market - so iPhone still has a market, while devices like the Blackberry Storm and Curve are a lot less favoured. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>The iPhone might be popular for browsing and other devices / OSs more popular elsewhere &#8211; but it (and similar) smartphones that rely almost entirely on wireless data to provide their core services are limited by the cost of that data.</p>
<p>As reported here -</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thestar.com/article/540077" rel="nofollow">http://www.thestar.com/article/540077</a></p>
<p>- Canadians like their smartphones but not the cost of the cost of the data plans, so many features are not being employed. Wi-fi capable phones are keeping the market alive in the home consumer market &#8211; so iPhone still has a market, while devices like the Blackberry Storm and Curve are a lot less favoured. </p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
