You should use DropBox instead. http://www.dropbox.com

From how I understand it, Mesh is a platform on which the current “mesh” file share service has been built more of as a proof of concept as opposed to an actual service/application . Live Sync is an actual “production” service. The Mesh folder share service may not see the light of production once Mesh is out of beta…

What I do like about Mesh vs. FolderShare, is the “cloudtop” or the ability to access that information directly on your mesh desktop vs. P2P nature of FolderShare… I would hope that we get to see that feature enabled in LiveSync (or in SkyDrive which is what I really think) and have the Mesh service start to go away.

I agree Live Mesh is a resource hog

I think the Live Mesh client takes away to much performance for my taste.

Does anyone know how much memory the LiveSync client uses? I find the Mesh client and service has slowed my tablet a great deal.

Also, I hear that OneCare will go and be replaced with a cut down version for less able computers

The big difference between the new Live Sync and Mesh is the status.

Folder Share has been through the whole beta program and MS now seem to think it is ready for production.

Mesh on the other hand has only just entered public beta and is far from ready for a production platform.

MS NEED a production ready sync platform. After all, much of their strategy calls for it so the fact that Mesh is at least 12 months away leaves a hole. Live Sync fills this hole (for now) although lets hope we see the two technologies merge together at a later date.

For that matter, what about SkyDrive? Why not merge all three services together?

Live Mesh actually “sounds” cool too. It’s got that cool hip sounding name, so it would appeal to a lot more than just the business IT guys like me.

I tried Foldershare a while back and it worked great, but now that Mesh has a Mac and Mobile client, it is a much better solution. Especially since you can even remote desktop to PC’s… expand that to Mac, and you’ve got a real winner.

I liked Folder Share for syncing a lot better than Live Mesh. While part of this was because FS actually had a Mac client (whereas LM did not until just recently), even on my PCs the FS interface is superior, in my opinion.

I was actually glad to see that they’re staying with it, albeit under a different name.

As for LM, it’s still the “engine” behind the syncing, as far as I know. And of course it also has the mobile components, right? FS is just computer to computer file sync.