Comments on: Windows Vista SP2 beta arriving with a slew of fixes http://jkontherun.com/2008/12/02/windows-vista-s/ Using mobile devices since they weighed 30 lbs. Tue, 17 Nov 2009 01:49:05 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: Nick http://jkontherun.com/2008/12/02/windows-vista-s/#comment-42308 Nick Sun, 07 Dec 2008 15:50:41 +0000 http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/12/02/windows-vista-s#comment-42308 <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <p>Just wondering what the build number for this release is?</p> </div>

Just wondering what the build number for this release is?

]]> By: MrGroove http://jkontherun.com/2008/12/02/windows-vista-s/#comment-42312 MrGroove Fri, 05 Dec 2008 00:24:53 +0000 http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/12/02/windows-vista-s#comment-42312 <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <p>@FancyBoyPrettyPinkSparkles - Your crazy. Vista SP1 having a larger impact then XP SP2? No.</p> </div>

@FancyBoyPrettyPinkSparkles – Your crazy. Vista SP1 having a larger impact then XP SP2? No.

]]> By: Karan http://jkontherun.com/2008/12/02/windows-vista-s/#comment-42316 Karan Wed, 03 Dec 2008 19:25:53 +0000 http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/12/02/windows-vista-s#comment-42316 <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <p>Here is a public link on Technet that lists most of the info you had listed:<br /> <a href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd335036.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd335036.aspx</a><br /> </p> </div>

Here is a public link on Technet that lists most of the info you had listed:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd335036.aspx

]]> By: FancyBoyPrettyPinkSparkles http://jkontherun.com/2008/12/02/windows-vista-s/#comment-42330 FancyBoyPrettyPinkSparkles Tue, 02 Dec 2008 12:58:15 +0000 http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/12/02/windows-vista-s#comment-42330 <p>in all my years & all the OSS/SP's i've seen. Vista > Vista SP1 was the biggest difference ever, even more so than XP SP1 > XP SP2.</p> <p>it was primarily noticeable on lowend performing machines (UMPC's) more so than highend machines. some would argue it was because Vista was so broke to begin with & they are probably right. but that still leaves me high hopes for SP 2.</p> in all my years & all the OSS/SP’s i’ve seen. Vista > Vista SP1 was the biggest difference ever, even more so than XP SP1 > XP SP2.

it was primarily noticeable on lowend performing machines (UMPC’s) more so than highend machines. some would argue it was because Vista was so broke to begin with & they are probably right. but that still leaves me high hopes for SP 2.

]]>