<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft offers .docx to HTML Firefox extension</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jkontherun.com/2008/12/08/microsoft-offer-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jkontherun.com/2008/12/08/microsoft-offer-2/</link>
	<description>Using mobile devices since they weighed 30 lbs.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ricky Brent</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2008/12/08/microsoft-offer-2/#comment-42078</link>
		<dc:creator>Ricky Brent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 14:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/12/08/microsoft-offer-2#comment-42078</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;I run into that all the time, Baz. (The docx thing.) It is nothing new; every time Word updates, there is a new version of .doc. Churlish or not, it has been part of the marketplace forever.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I like also sending PDF, just in case my writer program of choice messed up in its export to .doc.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This extension sounds really great, though. It should help with people who send along .docx files without thinking.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>I run into that all the time, Baz. (The docx thing.) It is nothing new; every time Word updates, there is a new version of .doc. Churlish or not, it has been part of the marketplace forever.</p>
<p>I like also sending PDF, just in case my writer program of choice messed up in its export to .doc.</p>
<p>This extension sounds really great, though. It should help with people who send along .docx files without thinking.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baz</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2008/12/08/microsoft-offer-2/#comment-42082</link>
		<dc:creator>Baz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 12:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/12/08/microsoft-offer-2#comment-42082</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;Kevin,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You actually know people/companies who willfully use the .docx extension? Doubtless then, you get others - using yet another WP - sending you .odt files, too? &lt;br /&gt;
These individuals and companies are clearly just yanking your (our) chains as they set about to &#039;create&#039; new standards for their correspondence (doubtless using their bright and shiny new WP which uses that as a default), while ignoring the fact that few others have the capabilities or interest in following along.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;95% of the documents I receive from companies or individuals (or I&#039;m asked to create for same) are created using Word&#039;s .doc (Word 97/2000/XP) format - regardless of what WP was used to create the document - while the 5% allows for doubt on somebody&#039;s part and are created in .rtf or .pdf, just in case.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Yes, I get that this &#039;old&#039; standard is just that and therefore not as attractive for users and that there might be some security issues involved, too - but for a WP manufacturer to create a new standard more with an eye to impose a market share issue (and therefore profits) over usability seems churlish - if not an enormous waste of time.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Kevin,</p>
<p>You actually know people/companies who willfully use the .docx extension? Doubtless then, you get others &#8211; using yet another WP &#8211; sending you .odt files, too? <br />
These individuals and companies are clearly just yanking your (our) chains as they set about to &#8216;create&#8217; new standards for their correspondence (doubtless using their bright and shiny new WP which uses that as a default), while ignoring the fact that few others have the capabilities or interest in following along.</p>
<p>95% of the documents I receive from companies or individuals (or I&#8217;m asked to create for same) are created using Word&#8217;s .doc (Word 97/2000/XP) format &#8211; regardless of what WP was used to create the document &#8211; while the 5% allows for doubt on somebody&#8217;s part and are created in .rtf or .pdf, just in case.</p>
<p>Yes, I get that this &#8216;old&#8217; standard is just that and therefore not as attractive for users and that there might be some security issues involved, too &#8211; but for a WP manufacturer to create a new standard more with an eye to impose a market share issue (and therefore profits) over usability seems churlish &#8211; if not an enormous waste of time.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
