<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Android- not just for phones anymore</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jkontherun.com/2009/01/02/android-not-just-for-phones-anymore/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jkontherun.com/2009/01/02/android-not-just-for-phones-anymore/</link>
	<description>Using mobile devices since they weighed 30 lbs.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 04:14:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: turn.self.off</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2009/01/02/android-not-just-for-phones-anymore/#comment-45015</link>
		<dc:creator>turn.self.off</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 09:06:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=27059#comment-45015</guid>
		<description>@oliver worried about inflexible guis?

seems that the google stuff adapts nicely at least...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@oliver worried about inflexible guis?</p>
<p>seems that the google stuff adapts nicely at least&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2009/01/02/android-not-just-for-phones-anymore/#comment-44981</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 23:20:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=27059#comment-44981</guid>
		<description>@turn.self.off -- yes, but software designed for the screensize of, say, the G1 wouldn&#039;t be something I&#039;d want to run on a netbook (and vice versa).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@turn.self.off &#8212; yes, but software designed for the screensize of, say, the G1 wouldn&#8217;t be something I&#8217;d want to run on a netbook (and vice versa).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2009/01/02/android-not-just-for-phones-anymore/#comment-44977</link>
		<dc:creator>Al</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 22:04:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=27059#comment-44977</guid>
		<description>I would love to see this Android netbook edition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would love to see this Android netbook edition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: turn.self.off</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2009/01/02/android-not-just-for-phones-anymore/#comment-44973</link>
		<dc:creator>turn.self.off</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 21:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=27059#comment-44973</guid>
		<description>a single pool of software?

thats the current problem, mostly. as most are using very &quot;obscure&quot; distros by default, the access to pre-packaged software is somewhat limited.

also, with the software itself being java based, one do not really need to recompiled, unless im deeply mistaken.

that is, no matter if its a x86 netbook or a ARM netbook, it still can make use of the android marketplace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a single pool of software?</p>
<p>thats the current problem, mostly. as most are using very &#8220;obscure&#8221; distros by default, the access to pre-packaged software is somewhat limited.</p>
<p>also, with the software itself being java based, one do not really need to recompiled, unless im deeply mistaken.</p>
<p>that is, no matter if its a x86 netbook or a ARM netbook, it still can make use of the android marketplace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2009/01/02/android-not-just-for-phones-anymore/#comment-44969</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 20:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=27059#comment-44969</guid>
		<description>So what would an Android netbook offer that a Linux netbook couldn&#039;t?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what would an Android netbook offer that a Linux netbook couldn&#8217;t?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: turn.self.off</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2009/01/02/android-not-just-for-phones-anymore/#comment-44967</link>
		<dc:creator>turn.self.off</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 19:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=27059#comment-44967</guid>
		<description>then it boils down to ones definition of a &quot;full&quot; browser...

basically its the same funny thing as that FIE that chippy loves to push. it all comes down to what one put into the word &quot;full&quot;...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>then it boils down to ones definition of a &#8220;full&#8221; browser&#8230;</p>
<p>basically its the same funny thing as that FIE that chippy loves to push. it all comes down to what one put into the word &#8220;full&#8221;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Kendrick</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2009/01/02/android-not-just-for-phones-anymore/#comment-44959</link>
		<dc:creator>James Kendrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 14:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=27059#comment-44959</guid>
		<description>A full web browser is going to be essential to sell the netbook to the world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A full web browser is going to be essential to sell the netbook to the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cody B</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2009/01/02/android-not-just-for-phones-anymore/#comment-44958</link>
		<dc:creator>Cody B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 13:47:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=27059#comment-44958</guid>
		<description>There is already a port to the N810.  I would suspect the N800 will be added shortly after the soft keyboard in the cupcake release.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is already a port to the N810.  I would suspect the N800 will be added shortly after the soft keyboard in the cupcake release.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin C. Tofel</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2009/01/02/android-not-just-for-phones-anymore/#comment-44957</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin C. Tofel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 13:40:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=27059#comment-44957</guid>
		<description>I think we&#039;ll see an Android netbook come to market in 2009, perhaps by mid-year. The netbook wave is still rising and Google will want to ride it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we&#8217;ll see an Android netbook come to market in 2009, perhaps by mid-year. The netbook wave is still rising and Google will want to ride it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: turn.self.off</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2009/01/02/android-not-just-for-phones-anymore/#comment-44956</link>
		<dc:creator>turn.self.off</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 13:33:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=27059#comment-44956</guid>
		<description>would it really need a full version of chrome?

iirc, there is already webkit hiding under the hood, so the only real diff would be the ui.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>would it really need a full version of chrome?</p>
<p>iirc, there is already webkit hiding under the hood, so the only real diff would be the ui.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
