<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bluetooth Over WiFi Looks Amazing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jkontherun.com/2009/02/19/bluetooth-over-wifi-looks-amazing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jkontherun.com/2009/02/19/bluetooth-over-wifi-looks-amazing/</link>
	<description>Using mobile devices since they weighed 30 lbs.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 08:55:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris Fabri</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2009/02/19/bluetooth-over-wifi-looks-amazing/#comment-48611</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Fabri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 20:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=30111#comment-48611</guid>
		<description>Yes, but it just provides another easy way to bridge.   I could see somebody easily using this to provide un-authenticated access on our wireless for other users on an un-authenticated wireless network.    Granted, they can do this today with other mechanisms, but this seems like something that could easily  be misconfigured and end up being bad news.  More of a &quot;don&#039;t attribute to malice what can be attributed to ignorance&quot; point of view.

Did I mention I&#039;m a network engineer?  :)    chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, but it just provides another easy way to bridge.   I could see somebody easily using this to provide un-authenticated access on our wireless for other users on an un-authenticated wireless network.    Granted, they can do this today with other mechanisms, but this seems like something that could easily  be misconfigured and end up being bad news.  More of a &#8220;don&#8217;t attribute to malice what can be attributed to ignorance&#8221; point of view.</p>
<p>Did I mention I&#8217;m a network engineer?  <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />     chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin C. Tofel</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2009/02/19/bluetooth-over-wifi-looks-amazing/#comment-48580</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin C. Tofel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 16:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=30111#comment-48580</guid>
		<description>Chris, since the session is managed by Bluetooth, it offers the same security as a standard Bluetooth connection. Since it&#039;s likely to be used for short-term purposes, I&#039;m not overly concerned from a security standpoint.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris, since the session is managed by Bluetooth, it offers the same security as a standard Bluetooth connection. Since it&#8217;s likely to be used for short-term purposes, I&#8217;m not overly concerned from a security standpoint.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Fabri</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2009/02/19/bluetooth-over-wifi-looks-amazing/#comment-48579</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Fabri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 16:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=30111#comment-48579</guid>
		<description>&quot;The new spec should be useful for those times when your devices aren’t on the same wireless network: a quick Bluetooth pairing and you transfer data at WiFi speeds without having to jump through network setup hoops.&quot;

This doesn&#039;t sound like a potential security nightmare.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The new spec should be useful for those times when your devices aren’t on the same wireless network: a quick Bluetooth pairing and you transfer data at WiFi speeds without having to jump through network setup hoops.&#8221;</p>
<p>This doesn&#8217;t sound like a potential security nightmare.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Techni</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2009/02/19/bluetooth-over-wifi-looks-amazing/#comment-48570</link>
		<dc:creator>Techni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 09:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=30111#comment-48570</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t this kind of like, coaxial over ethernet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t this kind of like, coaxial over ethernet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
