<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Netbook: the timeline of &#8220;genericness&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jkontherun.com/2009/03/02/netbook-the-timeline-of-genericness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jkontherun.com/2009/03/02/netbook-the-timeline-of-genericness/</link>
	<description>Using mobile devices since they weighed 30 lbs.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 10:54:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: HereAndNow</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2009/03/02/netbook-the-timeline-of-genericness/#comment-49575</link>
		<dc:creator>HereAndNow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 11:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=30867#comment-49575</guid>
		<description>@animatio
I checked out Psion&#039;s website and it looks like they make a lot of mobile devices. Depending on their product portfolio &amp; marketshare, perhaps Dell (and not Intel) should consider buying them. That would give Dell a whole portfolio of mobile products to build on AND the netbook trademark. That wouldn&#039;t help Intel and others, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@animatio<br />
I checked out Psion&#8217;s website and it looks like they make a lot of mobile devices. Depending on their product portfolio &amp; marketshare, perhaps Dell (and not Intel) should consider buying them. That would give Dell a whole portfolio of mobile products to build on AND the netbook trademark. That wouldn&#8217;t help Intel and others, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: animatio</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2009/03/02/netbook-the-timeline-of-genericness/#comment-49542</link>
		<dc:creator>animatio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 23:20:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=30867#comment-49542</guid>
		<description>about money spoken ....
&quot;Psion: Intel has &quot;unclean hands,&quot; we demand $1.2 Billion&quot;
Psion has countersued Intel, defending its claim to the netbook trademark, unveiling a somewhat suspect table of netBook revenues, and demanding triple all Intel&#039;s profits on netbook products (some $1.2 Billion) plus punitive damages. Will this go to a jury trial, or will Intel step in and buy Psion?
http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/news/2009/03/psion-countersues-flames-intel-for-unclean-hands.ars</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>about money spoken &#8230;.<br />
&#8220;Psion: Intel has &#8220;unclean hands,&#8221; we demand $1.2 Billion&#8221;<br />
Psion has countersued Intel, defending its claim to the netbook trademark, unveiling a somewhat suspect table of netBook revenues, and demanding triple all Intel&#8217;s profits on netbook products (some $1.2 Billion) plus punitive damages. Will this go to a jury trial, or will Intel step in and buy Psion?<br />
<a href="http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/news/2009/03/psion-countersues-flames-intel-for-unclean-hands.ars" rel="nofollow">http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/news/2009/03/psion-countersues-flames-intel-for-unclean-hands.ars</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sumocat</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2009/03/02/netbook-the-timeline-of-genericness/#comment-49539</link>
		<dc:creator>Sumocat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 21:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=30867#comment-49539</guid>
		<description>Not just Google Trends. I searched several major sites, including &lt;a href=&quot;http://jkontherun.com/page/50/?s=netbook&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;jkOnTheRun&lt;/a&gt;, and found no mention of &quot;netbook&quot; prior to February 2008, except in reference to the Psion Netbook. I also checked Wikipedia and found the &quot;netbook&quot; entry was updated in April 2008 to give credit to Intel for introducing the term. If there is any evidence of generic use of &quot;netbook&quot; for low-cost notebooks prior to Intel&#039;s use, I have not found it, nor has anyone else presented it.

On that topic, credit where it&#039;s due: the Eee PC was a joint project between Intel and Asustek, as reported by &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pcworld.com/article/132560/asustek_intel_working_on_199_notebook.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;PC World&lt;/a&gt; and others in June 2007. And they provided the XScale processor for Psion&#039;s Netbook Pro. Intel is involved in some way at nearly every point of the timeline.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not just Google Trends. I searched several major sites, including <a href="http://jkontherun.com/page/50/?s=netbook" rel="nofollow">jkOnTheRun</a>, and found no mention of &#8220;netbook&#8221; prior to February 2008, except in reference to the Psion Netbook. I also checked Wikipedia and found the &#8220;netbook&#8221; entry was updated in April 2008 to give credit to Intel for introducing the term. If there is any evidence of generic use of &#8220;netbook&#8221; for low-cost notebooks prior to Intel&#8217;s use, I have not found it, nor has anyone else presented it.</p>
<p>On that topic, credit where it&#8217;s due: the Eee PC was a joint project between Intel and Asustek, as reported by <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/132560/asustek_intel_working_on_199_notebook.html" rel="nofollow">PC World</a> and others in June 2007. And they provided the XScale processor for Psion&#8217;s Netbook Pro. Intel is involved in some way at nearly every point of the timeline.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2009/03/02/netbook-the-timeline-of-genericness/#comment-49531</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 21:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=30867#comment-49531</guid>
		<description>Anyone else getting tired of the battle over a 7 letter word?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone else getting tired of the battle over a 7 letter word?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: animatio</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2009/03/02/netbook-the-timeline-of-genericness/#comment-49528</link>
		<dc:creator>animatio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 20:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=30867#comment-49528</guid>
		<description>what ever the legal outcome of this might bee - sometimes things turn faster than a company might like. and speaking from experience - battle public usage of a term/word carries great risk of negative publicity for the company in question. as the old wise sage says: never stand against running water - it may become a deadly flood.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what ever the legal outcome of this might bee &#8211; sometimes things turn faster than a company might like. and speaking from experience &#8211; battle public usage of a term/word carries great risk of negative publicity for the company in question. as the old wise sage says: never stand against running water &#8211; it may become a deadly flood.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
