<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Samsung: Two Android Phones This Year, Less Google Inside</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jkontherun.com/2009/04/03/samsung-two-android-phones-this-year-less-google-inside/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jkontherun.com/2009/04/03/samsung-two-android-phones-this-year-less-google-inside/</link>
	<description>Using mobile devices since they weighed 30 lbs.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 17:14:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Louis</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2009/04/03/samsung-two-android-phones-this-year-less-google-inside/#comment-53680</link>
		<dc:creator>Louis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 17:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=33333#comment-53680</guid>
		<description>...like the BlackJack and BlackJack II? Those sold extremely well. The Omnia is selling pretty well too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;like the BlackJack and BlackJack II? Those sold extremely well. The Omnia is selling pretty well too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louis</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2009/04/03/samsung-two-android-phones-this-year-less-google-inside/#comment-53679</link>
		<dc:creator>Louis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 17:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=33333#comment-53679</guid>
		<description>Sounds like AT&amp;T may be one of those two carriers. Big Blue has been hesitant about Android since they&#039;re in bed with Yahoo (ex.: AT&amp;T/Yahoo DSL, Yahoo is the default search client on AT&amp;T phones, the YouTube player was pulled from TouchFLO on the HTC Fuze), and this article makes it seem like they&#039;re looking for the best of both worlds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like AT&amp;T may be one of those two carriers. Big Blue has been hesitant about Android since they&#8217;re in bed with Yahoo (ex.: AT&amp;T/Yahoo DSL, Yahoo is the default search client on AT&amp;T phones, the YouTube player was pulled from TouchFLO on the HTC Fuze), and this article makes it seem like they&#8217;re looking for the best of both worlds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2009/04/03/samsung-two-android-phones-this-year-less-google-inside/#comment-53625</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 23:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=33333#comment-53625</guid>
		<description>i think it&#039;s fine and good that the &quot;google&quot; can be decoupled from android, but if these companies are just duplicating efforts with their crapware, or make it hard or impossible to restore the &quot;google,&quot; then it&#039;s just annoying.

if the makers are going to just customize everything to the point of it not being &#039;android&#039;, it&#039;ll turn out the same as WinMo. but maybe google is ok with that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think it&#8217;s fine and good that the &#8220;google&#8221; can be decoupled from android, but if these companies are just duplicating efforts with their crapware, or make it hard or impossible to restore the &#8220;google,&#8221; then it&#8217;s just annoying.</p>
<p>if the makers are going to just customize everything to the point of it not being &#8216;android&#8217;, it&#8217;ll turn out the same as WinMo. but maybe google is ok with that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlotte</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2009/04/03/samsung-two-android-phones-this-year-less-google-inside/#comment-53616</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlotte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 19:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=33333#comment-53616</guid>
		<description>Android as it currently stands is a dumb idea for Google. There is no money in it. Since it&#039;s free and open source, the carriers will remove all Google products and replace with their own, Microsoft&#039;s or Yahoo&#039;s. In the worst case, Google will have to pay to be the featured search service. How stupid is that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Android as it currently stands is a dumb idea for Google. There is no money in it. Since it&#8217;s free and open source, the carriers will remove all Google products and replace with their own, Microsoft&#8217;s or Yahoo&#8217;s. In the worst case, Google will have to pay to be the featured search service. How stupid is that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: turn.self.off</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2009/04/03/samsung-two-android-phones-this-year-less-google-inside/#comment-53591</link>
		<dc:creator>turn.self.off</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 07:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=33333#comment-53591</guid>
		<description>and what makes you think im a iphone fan?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and what makes you think im a iphone fan?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2009/04/03/samsung-two-android-phones-this-year-less-google-inside/#comment-53572</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 00:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=33333#comment-53572</guid>
		<description>@turn.self.off thank god my iPhone didn&#039;t need any kind of Apple account.  Say, iTunes....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@turn.self.off thank god my iPhone didn&#8217;t need any kind of Apple account.  Say, iTunes&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: turn.self.off</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2009/04/03/samsung-two-android-phones-this-year-less-google-inside/#comment-53542</link>
		<dc:creator>turn.self.off</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 11:44:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=33333#comment-53542</guid>
		<description>one of the potential letdowns of android, was that it apparently needed a google accont to access basic functions. or at least thats how i understood some of the early news of the G1 launch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>one of the potential letdowns of android, was that it apparently needed a google accont to access basic functions. or at least thats how i understood some of the early news of the G1 launch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Virtuous</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2009/04/03/samsung-two-android-phones-this-year-less-google-inside/#comment-53527</link>
		<dc:creator>Virtuous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 05:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=33333#comment-53527</guid>
		<description>In the US Samsung&#039;s Android phones will sell about as well as their previous smartphones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the US Samsung&#8217;s Android phones will sell about as well as their previous smartphones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Smith</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2009/04/03/samsung-two-android-phones-this-year-less-google-inside/#comment-53487</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 02:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=33333#comment-53487</guid>
		<description>Wow, talk about missing the point of Android!

I was hopeful for this device but without the Google integration it&#039;s not even worth the time.

Glad you shared this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, talk about missing the point of Android!</p>
<p>I was hopeful for this device but without the Google integration it&#8217;s not even worth the time.</p>
<p>Glad you shared this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2009/04/03/samsung-two-android-phones-this-year-less-google-inside/#comment-53455</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 00:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=33333#comment-53455</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d agree that it doesn&#039;t make a whole lot of sense for Samsung to do this.  Wasn&#039;t one of the &quot;value propositions&quot; of Android (vs. other OSes) that it&#039;s cheaper for device manufacturers?  If they then end up putting a ton of customizations on top of it, those savings would be lost or reduced.  Plus, will it mean different Android phones look/feel/behave differently?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d agree that it doesn&#8217;t make a whole lot of sense for Samsung to do this.  Wasn&#8217;t one of the &#8220;value propositions&#8221; of Android (vs. other OSes) that it&#8217;s cheaper for device manufacturers?  If they then end up putting a ton of customizations on top of it, those savings would be lost or reduced.  Plus, will it mean different Android phones look/feel/behave differently?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
