<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Forrester Research: Netbook V2.0- Better Than Laptops?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jkontherun.com/2009/06/10/forrester-research-netbook-v2-0-better-than-laptops/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jkontherun.com/2009/06/10/forrester-research-netbook-v2-0-better-than-laptops/</link>
	<description>Using mobile devices since they weighed 30 lbs.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 11:47:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: HereAndNow</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2009/06/10/forrester-research-netbook-v2-0-better-than-laptops/#comment-61024</link>
		<dc:creator>HereAndNow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 09:24:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=37576#comment-61024</guid>
		<description>I think AMD may be suggesting a more logical way to segment the mobile computing market, that may lead to something like the following:

1. Ultra-light PCs
    - &quot;thick&quot; OS (Windows, OS X, Ubuntu, ...)
    - typical desktop usage (office apps, image &amp; video editing, ...)
    - CPU architecture: x86
    - primary sales channel: retail stores

2. Netbooks/Smartbooks
    - &quot;thin&quot; net-oriented OS (Android, Moblin, ...).
    - fast boot, fast run-time, always-on operation
    - super long battery life
    - touch-optimized UI
    - smartphone functionality (phone calls, SMS/MMS, LBS, etc.)
    - CPU architecture: x86 (Atom),ARM,MIPS
    - primary sales channel: mobile operators</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think AMD may be suggesting a more logical way to segment the mobile computing market, that may lead to something like the following:</p>
<p>1. Ultra-light PCs<br />
    &#8211; &#8220;thick&#8221; OS (Windows, OS X, Ubuntu, &#8230;)<br />
    &#8211; typical desktop usage (office apps, image &amp; video editing, &#8230;)<br />
    &#8211; CPU architecture: x86<br />
    &#8211; primary sales channel: retail stores</p>
<p>2. Netbooks/Smartbooks<br />
    &#8211; &#8220;thin&#8221; net-oriented OS (Android, Moblin, &#8230;).<br />
    &#8211; fast boot, fast run-time, always-on operation<br />
    &#8211; super long battery life<br />
    &#8211; touch-optimized UI<br />
    &#8211; smartphone functionality (phone calls, SMS/MMS, LBS, etc.)<br />
    &#8211; CPU architecture: x86 (Atom),ARM,MIPS<br />
    &#8211; primary sales channel: mobile operators</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luscious</title>
		<link>http://jkontherun.com/2009/06/10/forrester-research-netbook-v2-0-better-than-laptops/#comment-60948</link>
		<dc:creator>Luscious</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=37576#comment-60948</guid>
		<description>This has been my same exact view all along. The advent of Intel&#039;s Pineview and Medfield platforms along with the relaxed requirements of Windows 7 will bring netbooks up to the same functionality and basic performance as any notebook out there.

Indeed, the ability to squeeze today&#039;s sub-$1000 notebook performance into the netbook portability factor while maintaining functionality has been something that was bound to happen. It was never a question of if, but when.

At the extreme opposite of the scale, however, I simply could not pass up a full-spec M17x from Dell to get my serious work done. That notebook, in the true sense of the word, is the most powerful and impressive notebook I have seen in the last 5 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This has been my same exact view all along. The advent of Intel&#8217;s Pineview and Medfield platforms along with the relaxed requirements of Windows 7 will bring netbooks up to the same functionality and basic performance as any notebook out there.</p>
<p>Indeed, the ability to squeeze today&#8217;s sub-$1000 notebook performance into the netbook portability factor while maintaining functionality has been something that was bound to happen. It was never a question of if, but when.</p>
<p>At the extreme opposite of the scale, however, I simply could not pass up a full-spec M17x from Dell to get my serious work done. That notebook, in the true sense of the word, is the most powerful and impressive notebook I have seen in the last 5 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
